Brief report: beyond clinical experience: features of data collection and interpretation that contribute to diagnostic accuracy
- PMID: 17105525
- PMCID: PMC1924750
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00587.x
Brief report: beyond clinical experience: features of data collection and interpretation that contribute to diagnostic accuracy
Abstract
Background: Clinical experience, features of data collection process, or both, affect diagnostic accuracy, but their respective role is unclear. OBJECTIVE, DESIGN: Prospective, observational study, to determine the respective contribution of clinical experience and data collection features to diagnostic accuracy.
Methods: Six Internists, 6 second year internal medicine residents, and 6 senior medical students worked up the same 7 cases with a standardized patient. Each encounter was audiotaped and immediately assessed by the subjects who indicated the reasons underlying their data collection. We analyzed the encounters according to diagnostic accuracy, information collected, organ systems explored, diagnoses evaluated, and final decisions made, and we determined predictors of diagnostic accuracy by logistic regression models.
Results: Several features significantly predicted diagnostic accuracy after correction for clinical experience: early exploration of correct diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 24.35) or of relevant diagnostic hypotheses (OR 2.22) to frame clinical data collection, larger number of diagnostic hypotheses evaluated (OR 1.08), and collection of relevant clinical data (OR 1.19).
Conclusion: Some features of data collection and interpretation are related to diagnostic accuracy beyond clinical experience and should be explicitly included in clinical training and modeled by clinical teachers. Thoroughness in data collection should not be considered a privileged way to diagnostic success.
Comment in
-
Predicting diagnostic accuracy.J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jul;22(7):1064; author reply 1065. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0214-4. J Gen Intern Med. 2007. PMID: 17458573 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Elstein AS, Shulman LS, Sprafka SA. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1978. Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning.
-
- Norman GR. Research in clinical reasoning: past history and current trends. Med Educ. 2005;39:418–27. - PubMed
-
- Norman GR, Brooks LR, Cunnington JPW, Shali V, Marriott M, Regehr G. Expert-novice differences in the use of history and visual information from patients. Acad Med. 1996;71:62–4. - PubMed
-
- Brooks LR, LeBlanc VR, Norman GR. On the difficulty of noticing obvious features in patient appearance. Psychol Sci. 2000;11:112–7. - PubMed
-
- Leblanc VR, Brooks LR, Norman GR. Believing is seeing: the influence of a diagnostic hypothesis on the interpretation of clinical features. Acad Med. 2002;77:S67–S69. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources