Choice of surgery for stress incontinence
- PMID: 17106954
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.02.005
Choice of surgery for stress incontinence
Abstract
Objective: To outline the evidence for the efficacy of surgical procedures used for the primary treatment of urinary incontinence.
Options: The range of surgical options available for the primary treatment of urinary incontinence in women.
Outcomes: The best possible outcomes for women undergoing primary surgery for urinary incontinence. To provide a current understanding of the evidence available as the basis of an informed discussion of the anticipated outcome of surgery.
Evidence: A systematic review of clinical trials of the outcomes of primary surgical treatment of urinary incontinence.
Values: The quality of the evidence is rated using the criteria described by the Canadian Task Force on periodic health examination (Table).
Benefits, harms, and costs: Careful consideration of the surgical options available will result in informed choice, which is essential to the process of determining the most appropriate surgery for a woman. Use of a range of surgeries that have the highest proven efficacy is most likely to result in long-term patient satisfaction.
Republished from
-
RETIRED: Choice of surgery for stress incontinence.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005 Oct;27(10):964-80. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30744-7. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005. PMID: 16411012 English, French.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
