Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Oct;95(1):88-96.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.02.005.

Choice of surgery for stress incontinence

Choice of surgery for stress incontinence

Magali Robert et al. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: To outline the evidence for the efficacy of surgical procedures used for the primary treatment of urinary incontinence.

Options: The range of surgical options available for the primary treatment of urinary incontinence in women.

Outcomes: The best possible outcomes for women undergoing primary surgery for urinary incontinence. To provide a current understanding of the evidence available as the basis of an informed discussion of the anticipated outcome of surgery.

Evidence: A systematic review of clinical trials of the outcomes of primary surgical treatment of urinary incontinence.

Values: The quality of the evidence is rated using the criteria described by the Canadian Task Force on periodic health examination (Table).

Benefits, harms, and costs: Careful consideration of the surgical options available will result in informed choice, which is essential to the process of determining the most appropriate surgery for a woman. Use of a range of surgeries that have the highest proven efficacy is most likely to result in long-term patient satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Republished from

  • RETIRED: Choice of surgery for stress incontinence.
    Robert M, Farrell SA, Easton WA, Epp A, Flood CG, Girouard L, Lajoie F, MacMillan JB, Mainprize TC; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Robert M, et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005 Oct;27(10):964-80. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30744-7. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005. PMID: 16411012 English, French.

LinkOut - more resources