Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Nov;114(11):1755-62.
doi: 10.1289/ehp.9056.

The use of biomonitoring data in exposure and human health risk assessments

Affiliations

The use of biomonitoring data in exposure and human health risk assessments

Richard Albertini et al. Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Nov.

Abstract

Biomonitoring uses analytic methods that permit the accurate measurement of low levels of environmental chemicals in human tissues. However, depending on the intended use, biomonitoring, like all exposure tools, may not be a stand-alone exposure assessment tool for some of its environmental public health uses. Although biomonitoring data demonstrate that many environmental chemicals are absorbed in human tissues, uncertainty exists regarding if and at what concentrations many of these chemicals cause adverse health outcomes. Moreover, without exposure pathway information, it is difficult to relate biomonitoring results to sources and routes of exposure and develop effective health risk management strategies. In September 2004, the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, and International Council of Chemical Associations co-sponsored the International Biomonitoring Workshop, which explored the processes and information needed for placing biomonitoring data into perspective for risk assessment purposes, with special emphasis on integrating biomarker measurements of exposure, internal dose, and potential health outcome. Scientists from international governments, academia, and industry recommended criteria for applying biomonitoring data for various uses. Six case studies, which are part of this mini-monograph, were examined: inorganic arsenic, methyl eugenol, organophosphorus pesticides, perfluorooctanesulfonate, phthalates, and polybrominated diphenyl ethers. Based on the workshop and follow-up discussions, this overview article summarizes lessons learned, identifies data gaps, outlines research needs, and offers guidance for designing and conducting biomonitoring studies, as well as interpreting biomonitoring data in the context of risk assessment and risk management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The environmental public health continuum (EPHC).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Focus area for the September 2004 International Biomonitoring Workshop. *Factors/criteria discussed at the workshop.

References

    1. AHS (Agricultural Health Study) 2005. Home Page. Available: http://www.aghealth.org/results.html [accessed 9 April 2006].
    1. Alexander BH. 2004. Bladder Cancer in Perfluorooctanesulfonyl Fluoride Manufacturing Workers. U.S. EPA Docket AR-226-1958. Washington, DC:U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
    1. Alexander BH, Olsen GW, Burris JM, Mandel JH, Mandel JS. Mortality of employees of a perfluorooctanesulfonyl fluoride manufacturing facility. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60:722–729. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Api AM. Toxicological profile of diethyl phthalate: a vehicle for fragrance and cosmetic ingredients. Food Chem Toxicol. 2001;39:97–108. - PubMed
    1. Balshaw DM, Philbert M, Suk WA. Research strategies for safety evaluation of nanomaterials. Part III: Nanoscale technologies for assessing risk and improving public health. Toxicol Sci. 2005;88:298–306. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources