Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement
- PMID: 17108833
- DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000245852.70594.d5
Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement
Abstract
Study design: Prospective clinical study enrolled in 2 centers (Munich and Liberec) as part of a prospective European multicenter study with ProDisc C (Synthes Inc., Paoli, PA).
Objectives: The first goal of the study was to evaluate the rate of heterotopic ossifications identified with plain radiograph following total cervical disc replacement (TCDR). The second goal was to show whether segmental motion can be preserved, and whether TCDR can provide improvement of the patient's ability to perform activities of daily living as well as a decrease of pain.
Summary of background data: Only a few reports about the radiologic outcome after TCDR are published so far. Heterotopic ossification is a well-known phenomenon after total hip arthroplasty. The rate of heterotopic ossification following TCDR is unclear.
Methods: The radiographs of 54 patients (in total, 77 implanted prostheses) were analyzed 1 year after TCDR with a ProDisc C prosthesis. We classified the heterotopic ossification in 5 grades according to a recently published classification system for lumbar total disc replacement. For clinical parameters, the visual analog scale and the Neck Disability Index were evaluated preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. The Student t test and Wilcoxon test were used for statistical analysis.
Results: In 26 treated segments (33.8%), no heterotopic ossification was detectable. Grade 1 ossifications were present in 6 levels (7.8%). A total of 30 segments (39.0%) showed grade 2 ossifications. Heterotopic ossifications that led to restrictions of the range of motion were present in 8 cases (10.4%). One year postoperatively, 7 cases (9.1%) had a spontaneous fusion of the treated segment. The clinical parameters improved significantly and were similar to previous reports about TCDR.
Conclusions: Only 33.8% of the patients did not show any signs of heterotopic ossification, and the rate of spontaneous fusion after TCDR 1 year after surgery was unexpectedly high. There were 49.4% of the patients with grade 2-3 ossification, which lets us suspect an even higher rate of spontaneous fusion after long-term follow-ups. Motion preservation after TCDR is only guaranteed if spontaneous fusion can be prevented. Thus, mobility of the implanted segments needs to be further studied.
Similar articles
-
Early development and progression of heterotopic ossification in cervical total disc replacement.J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jan;16(1):31-6. doi: 10.3171/2011.8.SPINE11303. Epub 2011 Oct 14. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012. PMID: 21999390
-
Clinical and radiological outcome at 10 years of follow-up after total cervical disc replacement.Eur Spine J. 2017 Sep;26(9):2441-2449. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5204-6. Epub 2017 Jul 4. Eur Spine J. 2017. PMID: 28676980
-
Heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc replacement: determination by CT and effects on clinical outcomes.J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Apr;14(4):457-65. doi: 10.3171/2010.11.SPINE10444. Epub 2011 Feb 4. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011. PMID: 21294610
-
High prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc arthroplasty: outcome and intraoperative findings following explantation of 22 cervical disc prostheses.J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Aug;17(2):141-6. doi: 10.3171/2012.4.SPINE12223. Epub 2012 Jun 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012. PMID: 22657947 Review.
-
Double-level cervical total disc replacement for adjacent segment disease: is it a useful treatment? Description of late onset heterotopic ossification and review of the literature.Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18(1 Suppl):15-23. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014. PMID: 24825036 Review.
Cited by
-
Biomechanics of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty-A Review of Concepts and Current Technology.Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(s2):S14-S28. doi: 10.14444/7087. Int J Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 32994302 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term Evaluation of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty with the Mobi-C© Cervical Disc: A Randomized, Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial with Seven-Year Follow-up.Int J Spine Surg. 2017 Nov 28;11(4):31. doi: 10.14444/4031. eCollection 2017. Int J Spine Surg. 2017. PMID: 29372135 Free PMC article.
-
Higher reoperation rate following cervical disc replacement in a retrospective, long-term comparative study of 715 patients.Eur Spine J. 2017 Sep;26(9):2434-2440. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5218-0. Epub 2017 Jul 17. Eur Spine J. 2017. PMID: 28718168
-
The Effect of Preoperative Cervical Spondylosis on Heterotopic Ossification After Cervical Disc Replacement.Global Spine J. 2024 Jan;14(1):56-66. doi: 10.1177/21925682221094265. Epub 2022 Apr 9. Global Spine J. 2024. PMID: 35403474 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of dynamic cervical implant replacement for treatment of single-level degenerative cervical disc disease: a 24-month follow-up.Eur Spine J. 2014 Aug;23(8):1680-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3180-7. Epub 2014 Jan 29. Eur Spine J. 2014. PMID: 24474644
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials