Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Feb;110(2):104-10.
doi: 10.1007/s00113-006-1195-1.

[Structural femoral head allografts in revision surgery of loosened acetabular cups]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Structural femoral head allografts in revision surgery of loosened acetabular cups]

[Article in German]
C Wedemeyer et al. Unfallchirurg. 2007 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Treatment of acetabular bone defects presents a great challenge in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Many methods of acetabular reconstruction have been described. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the midterm results of structural femoral head allografts for acetabular reconstruction.

Methods: Thirty-six patients (33 females and 3 males) with acetabular defects ranging from type 2C to type 3B according to Paprosky's classification were included in the study. In all cases acetabular defects were closed using allografts from femoral heads. In 13 cases an uncemented press-fit cup, in 17 cases a cemented polyethylene socket, and in 6 cases a Burch-Schneider antiprotrusion cage was implanted. The mean follow-up period was 84.2 months (range: 5-147).

Results: Four acetabular components failed. All 36 grafts were osseointegrated radiographically and formed a mechanically stable construction. The mean Harris Hip Score at the most recent follow-up was 79.8 points. The distance from the obturator line to the prosthesis head center was 3.73 cm (1.17-5.80 cm) preoperatively and 2.79 cm (0.85-4.8 cm) postoperatively (p<0.05). The distance from the teardrop figure to the prosthesis head center was 3.02 cm (1.0-5.8 cm) preoperatively and 3.25 cm (1.6-4.8 cm) postoperatively (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Closure of acetabular defects of types 2C to 3B according to Paprosky's classification can be satisfactorily accomplished using femoral head allografts. These allografts may facilitate future revision surgery. Femoral heads are readily available due to widespread primary total hip replacement surgery. However, the use of structural femoral head allografts for acetabular reconstruction is cost intensive. Individual patient-related aspects, such as the function of revision arthroplasty, have to be considered when planning revision arthroplasty using femoral head allografts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi. 1993 May;67(5):408-16 - PubMed
    1. J Arthroplasty. 1993 Aug;8(4):341-6 - PubMed
    1. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2005 Jan-Feb;143(1):56-63 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Dec;(369):198-207 - PubMed
    1. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Mar;(276):7-18 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources