Surface microhardness of enamel after different home bleaching procedures

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of different home bleaching procedures on surface microhardness of human enamel.

Methods: Among eight groups 192 incisors were distributed. The facial surface of each incisor was polished and baseline hardness of enamel (m0; Knoop) was assessed with a load of 1N for 30s. Subsequently, the enamel was treated for 14 days with the bleaching agent: groups 1, 2 and 4 Viva Style Paint on, 8% carbamide peroxide (CP) 1x20min, 2x20min and 2x5min; group 3 Colgate Simply White, 5.9% hydrogen peroxide (HP), 2x30min; group 5 Viva Style 10% CP 1x1h; group 6 Blend-a-med White Strips, 5.9% HP 2x30min; group 7 Odol-med3 Beauty-Kur, sodium chlorite 2x10min; group 8 control, running water 1x1h. Hardness was reassessed after the last bleaching treatment (m1) and after 6 weeks storage in artificial saliva (m2).

Results: Changes in microhardness were as follows (m0-m1): (1) -2.3 (+/-20.3); (2) -8.9 (+/-27.2); (3) 63.4 (+/-56.3); (4) 9.6 (+/-30.1); (5) 12.8 (+/-62.6); (6) 92.2 (+/-50.2); (7) 158.4 (+/-59.7); (8) 10.6 (+/-38.5). Statistical analysis showed that hardness values were significantly (p< or =0.0005; Wilcoxon test) reduced in groups 3, 6, and 7 (m1) and in group 7 (m2).

Significance: Both type of bleaching agent and concentration have a significant influence on the microhardness of enamel. The most critical bleaching agent seems to be the one containing sodium chlorite in combination with citric acid.