Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2007 Apr;48(2):156-9.
doi: 10.1007/s10329-006-0017-y. Epub 2006 Nov 17.

Wild chimpanzee infant urine and saliva sampled noninvasively usable for DNA analyses

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Wild chimpanzee infant urine and saliva sampled noninvasively usable for DNA analyses

Eiji Inoue et al. Primates. 2007 Apr.

Abstract

In many genetic studies on the great apes, fecal or hair samples have been used as sources of DNA. However, feces and hairs are difficult to collect from chimpanzee infants under 3 years of age. As alternative DNA sources, we investigated the efficiency of collecting urine samples from infants compared with fecal samples, as well as the validity of the DNA extracted from urine and saliva samples of well-habituated M group chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) in the Mahale Mountains National Park, Tanzania. We collected 40 urine and 3 fecal samples from 10 infants under 3 years. Compared with feces, the urine samples were relatively easy to collect. The saliva of infants, which remained on the twigs sucked by them, was collected using cotton swabs. The average amounts of DNA extracted from the 40 urine and 6 saliva samples were 3,920 and 458 pg/mul, respectively. The rate of positive PCR was low and the allelic dropout rate was high when using less than 25 pg of template DNA in the PCR mixtures. Based on the amounts of DNA, 50% of the urine samples and 100% of the saliva samples were judged usable for accurate microsatellite genotyping. For infant chimpanzees in particular, collecting urine and saliva as an alternative to fecal and hair samples can reduce the effort invested in collection in the field.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 May;130(1):103-15 - PubMed
    1. Am J Primatol. 2005 Jun;66(2):119-30 - PubMed
    1. Am J Primatol. 1999;48(4):299-304 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Nov 6;98(23):12890-5 - PubMed
    1. Mol Ecol. 2001 May;10(5):1279-300 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources