Automatic user customization for improving the performance of a self-paced brain interface system
- PMID: 17111117
- DOI: 10.1007/s11517-006-0125-2
Automatic user customization for improving the performance of a self-paced brain interface system
Abstract
Customizing the parameter values of brain interface (BI) systems by a human expert has the advantage of being fast and computationally efficient. However, as the number of users and EEG channels grows, this process becomes increasingly time consuming and exhausting. Manual customization also introduces inaccuracies in the estimation of the parameter values. In this paper, the performance of a self-paced BI system whose design parameter values were automatically user customized using a genetic algorithm (GA) is studied. The GA automatically estimates the shapes of movement-related potentials (MRPs), whose features are then extracted to drive the BI. Offline analysis of the data of eight subjects revealed that automatic user customization improved the true positive (TP) rate of the system by an average of 6.68% over that whose customization was carried out by a human expert, i.e., by visually inspecting the MRP templates. On average, the best improvement in the TP rate (an average of 9.82%) was achieved for four individuals with spinal cord injury. In this case, the visual estimation of the parameter values of the MRP templates was very difficult because of the highly noisy nature of the EEG signals. For four able-bodied subjects, for which the MRP templates were less noisy, the automatic user customization led to an average improvement of 3.58% in the TP rate. The results also show that the inter-subject variability of the TP rate is also reduced compared to the case when user customization is carried out by a human expert. These findings provide some primary evidence that automatic user customization leads to beneficial results in the design of a self-paced BI for individuals with spinal cord injury.
Similar articles
-
Application of a hybrid wavelet feature selection method in the design of a self-paced brain interface system.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007 Apr 30;4:11. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-4-11. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2007. PMID: 17470288 Free PMC article.
-
A self-paced brain-computer interface system with a low false positive rate.J Neural Eng. 2008 Mar;5(1):9-23. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/5/1/002. Epub 2007 Dec 11. J Neural Eng. 2008. PMID: 18310807
-
A self-paced brain interface system that uses movement related potentials and changes in the power of brain rhythms.J Comput Neurosci. 2007 Aug;23(1):21-37. doi: 10.1007/s10827-006-0017-3. Epub 2007 Jan 10. J Comput Neurosci. 2007. PMID: 17216365
-
Flexibility and practicality graz brain-computer interface approach.Int Rev Neurobiol. 2009;86:119-31. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(09)86009-1. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2009. PMID: 19607995 Review.
-
Brain-computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation.Lancet Neurol. 2008 Nov;7(11):1032-43. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70223-0. Epub 2008 Oct 2. Lancet Neurol. 2008. PMID: 18835541 Review.
Cited by
-
Feature selection on movement imagery discrimination and attention detection.Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010 Apr;48(4):331-41. doi: 10.1007/s11517-010-0578-1. Epub 2010 Jan 29. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2010. PMID: 20112135 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of a self-paced brain computer interface on data contaminated with eye-movement artifacts and on data recorded in a subsequent session.Comput Intell Neurosci. 2008;2008:749204. doi: 10.1155/2008/749204. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2008. PMID: 18497872 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical