Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1991 Spring;15(1):89-93.
doi: 10.1016/s0149-7634(05)80097-1.

Strategies for assessing neurotoxicity

Affiliations
Review

Strategies for assessing neurotoxicity

R C Switzer 3rd. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1991 Spring.

Abstract

The ultimate end point among the various measures of neurotoxicity is the death of neurons, since they do not regenerate. Experiments that accurately assess this degree of neurotoxicity must utilize a sensitive means of detection and control for the factors that are variables in the expression of neurotoxicity. Neurotoxic substances have the characteristic trait that each selectively destroys specific populations or subpopulations of neurons. The mechanisms underlying this selectivity are generally unknown. Without a priori knowledge of where in the brain to look, it is prudent to employ a histological procedure that imparts an easily detected marker to degenerating neuronal components. For example, the so-called "reduced silver" stains specifically impregnate degenerating neural elements. From studies of known neurotoxins, several factors have been shown to influence neurotoxicity: 1) species and strains; 2) age; 3) sex; 4) dose rate (acute vs. chronic); 5) survival time; and 6) sampling interval in the brain. Failure to include these factors in a screening paradigm could yield false-negative results and, thereby, invalidate extrapolations made to man.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources