Prescreening tools to determine who needs DXA
- PMID: 17112425
- DOI: 10.1007/s11914-996-0023-4
Prescreening tools to determine who needs DXA
Abstract
Clinical decision rules (CDRs) are designed to help physicians practice better. A number of CDRs to assist in identifying women with low bone mass have been developed since the mid 1990s, including SCORE, OST (OSTA), OSIRIS, SOFSURF, NOF, ABONE, pBW, ORAI, and weight-only-EPIDOS (which we have termed WO-E). This review discusses these CDRs in terms of development and validation cohorts and their sensitivity and specificity. The sensitivities of the available CDRs exceed 80% and specificities are about 50%. After much analysis, it appears that most experts prefer OST for its simplicity and SCORE for its flexibility, but there is no consensus on what risk factors to use in the CDRs and what regions of interest (spine, total hip, femoral neck, or a combination) to test with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Because of the lack of consensus, there are barriers to the clinical application of these CDRs. Agreement on a single CDR for worldwide use is required to optimally fulfill the objective of identifying low bone mass.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of decision rules for referring women for bone densitometry by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.JAMA. 2001 Jul 4;286(1):57-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.1.57. JAMA. 2001. PMID: 11434827
-
Performance of four clinical screening tools to select peri- and early postmenopausal women for dual X-ray absorptiometry.Osteoporos Int. 2005 Jul;16(7):764-72. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1748-5. Epub 2004 Sep 30. Osteoporos Int. 2005. PMID: 15986263
-
Comparison of Clinical Risk Tools for Predicting Osteoporosis in Women Ages 50-64.J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Mar-Apr;29(2):233-9. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2016.02.150237. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016. PMID: 26957380
-
Indications of DXA in women younger than 65 yr and men younger than 70 yr: the 2013 Official Positions.J Clin Densitom. 2013 Oct-Dec;16(4):467-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Sep 20. J Clin Densitom. 2013. PMID: 24055260 Review.
-
Beyond bone mineral density: can existing clinical risk assessment instruments identify women at increased risk of osteoporosis?J Intern Med. 2004 Nov;256(5):375-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01397.x. J Intern Med. 2004. PMID: 15485472 Review.
Cited by
-
Osteoporosis risk prediction for bone mineral density assessment of postmenopausal women using machine learning.Yonsei Med J. 2013 Nov;54(6):1321-30. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.6.1321. Yonsei Med J. 2013. PMID: 24142634 Free PMC article.
-
Characterisation of patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis in French primary healthcare.Drugs Aging. 2007;24(7):603-14. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200724070-00007. Drugs Aging. 2007. PMID: 17658910
-
Performance of Osteoporosis Self-assessment Tool for Asian (OSTA) for Primary Osteoporosis in Post-menopausal Malay Women.Malays Orthop J. 2012 Mar;6(1):35-9. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1203.011. Malays Orthop J. 2012. PMID: 25279040 Free PMC article.
-
An economic evaluation: Simulation of the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of universal prevention strategies against osteoporosis-related fractures.J Bone Miner Res. 2013 Feb;28(2):383-94. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1758. J Bone Miner Res. 2013. PMID: 22991210 Free PMC article.
-
Improving the sensitivity of the Dutch guidelines for case finding in osteoporosis.Br J Gen Pract. 2009 May;59(562):370-1. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X420671. Br J Gen Pract. 2009. PMID: 19401018 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical