Impact of a theoretically based sex education programme (SHARE) delivered by teachers on NHS registered conceptions and terminations: final results of cluster randomised trial
- PMID: 17118950
- PMCID: PMC1779834
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39014.503692.55
Impact of a theoretically based sex education programme (SHARE) delivered by teachers on NHS registered conceptions and terminations: final results of cluster randomised trial
Abstract
Objective: To assess the impact of a theoretically based sex education programme (SHARE) delivered by teachers compared with conventional education in terms of conceptions and terminations registered by the NHS.
Design: Follow-up of cluster randomised trial 4.5 years after intervention.
Setting: NHS records of women who had attended 25 secondary schools in east Scotland.
Participants: 4196 women (99.5% of those eligible).
Intervention: SHARE programme (intervention group) v existing sex education (control group).
Main outcome measure: NHS recorded conceptions and terminations for the achieved sample linked at age 20.
Results: In an "intention to treat" analysis there were no significant differences between the groups in registered conceptions per 1000 pupils (300 SHARE v 274 control; difference 26, 95% confidence interval -33 to 86) and terminations per 1000 pupils (127 v 112; difference 15, -13 to 42) between ages 16 and 20.
Conclusions: This specially designed sex education programme did not reduce conceptions or terminations by age 20 compared with conventional provision. The lack of effect was not due to quality of delivery. Enhancing teacher led school sex education beyond conventional provision in eastern Scotland is unlikely to reduce terminations in teenagers.
Trial registration: ISRCTN48719575 [controlled-trials.com].
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures
Comment in
-
Sexual health in adolescents.BMJ. 2007 Jan 20;334(7585):103-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39087.374653.BE. BMJ. 2007. PMID: 17235054 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review addresses socioeconomic inequalities.BMJ. 2007 Feb 3;334(7587):221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39108.405139.1F. BMJ. 2007. PMID: 17272534 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Education programme has changed since study.BMJ. 2007 Feb 3;334(7587):221. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39108.388345.1F. BMJ. 2007. PMID: 17272535 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Singh S, Darroch JE. Adolescent pregnancy and childbearing: levels and trends in industrialized countries. Fam Plann Perspect 2000;32:14-23. - PubMed
-
- Social Exclusion Unit. Teenage pregnancy. London: Stationery Office, 1999. (4342) www.socialexclusion.gov.uk/downloaddoc.asp?id=69.
-
- Watts C, Zimmermann C. Violence against women: global scope and magnitude. Lancet 2002;359:1232-7. - PubMed
-
- Diamond I, Clements S, Stone N, Ingham R. Spatial variation in teenage conceptions in south and west England. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc 1999;162:273-89.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical