Agreement between the AMPLICOR Human Papillomavirus Test and the Hybrid Capture 2 assay in detection of high-risk human papillomavirus and diagnosis of biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical disease
- PMID: 17122008
- PMCID: PMC1828999
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.00706-06
Agreement between the AMPLICOR Human Papillomavirus Test and the Hybrid Capture 2 assay in detection of high-risk human papillomavirus and diagnosis of biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical disease
Abstract
The AMPLICOR HPV test (AMP) and the Hybrid Capture 2 assay (HC2) detect 13 high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) types. Evaluation of comparative performance with clinical samples is needed to allow informed implementation of AMP into clinical practice. AMP was used (i) to assess the prevalence of HR-HPV in 1,032 samples of known cytology, HC2 status, and/or confirmed histology; (ii) to determine agreement between AMP and HC2; (iii) to evaluate the clinical sensitivity and specificity for detecting HR-HPV; and (iv) to detect the presence of biopsy-confirmed high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The prevalence of HR-HPV was 39.3% and 45.6% by AMP and HC2, respectively. Overall agreement was 89.2% (kappa value, 0.78). Of 509 HR-HPV-negative specimens by HC2, 488 (95.9%) were AMP negative. Of 427 HR-HPV-positive specimens by HC2, 347 (81.2%) were AMP positive. In comparing the ability to detect high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), the two tests were positive for all HSIL samples. Both tests performed similarly on CIN2+ samples (clinical sensitivities were 96.7% and 97.8%, respectively, for AMP and HC2). The clinical specificities of AMP and HC2 were comparable (54.9% versus 51.6%; P=0.18). Genotyping of 20 HC2-negative/AMP-positive cases using alternative technologies revealed target HR genotypes in 63.1% of cases and low-risk types in 15.7% of cases, while 21% of cases were negative. In conclusion, AMP provides a viable alternative to HC2, with good agreement for samples with high-grade cytology and similar sensitivity in detecting CIN2+ lesions.
References
-
- Agorastos, T., K. Dinas, B. Lloveras, S. de Sanjose, J. R. Kornegay, H. Bonti, F. X. Bosch, T. Constantinidis, and J. Bontis. 2005. Human papillomavirus testing for primary screening in women at low risk of developing cervical cancer. The Greek experience. Gynecol. Oncol. 96:714-720. - PubMed
-
- Bais, A. G., M. Rebolj, P. J. Snijders, F. A. de Schipper, D. A. van der Meulen, R. H. Verheijen, F. Voorhorst, M. van Ballegooijen, C. J. Meijer, and T. J. Helmerhorst. 2005. Triage using HPV-testing in persistent borderline and mildly dyskaryotic smears: proposal for new guidelines. Int. J. Cancer 116:122-129. - PubMed
-
- Bollmann, R., A. Bankfalvi, H. Griefingholt, A. Trosic, N. Speich, C. Schmitt, and M. Bollmann. 2005. Validity of combined cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping with adjuvant DNA-cytometry in routine cervical screening: results from 31031 women from the Bonn-region in West Germany. Oncol. Rep. 13:915-922. - PubMed
-
- Carozzi, F. M., M. Confortini, S. Cecchini, S. Bisanzi, M. P. Cariaggi, G. Pontenani, M. R. Raspollini, C. Sani, M. Zappa, and S. Ciatto. 2005. Triage with human papillomavirus testing of women with cytologic abnormalities prompting referral for colposcopy assessment. Cancer 105:2-7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials