Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2007 Jul;22(7):749-56.
doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0220-8. Epub 2006 Nov 23.

No prognostic impact of isolated lymphovascular invasion after radical resection of rectal cancer--results of a multicenter observational study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

No prognostic impact of isolated lymphovascular invasion after radical resection of rectal cancer--results of a multicenter observational study

Henry Ptok et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The prognostic impact of isolated lymphovascular invasion (LVI) after radical resection of rectal cancer is controversially discussed. However, it could be relevant to decide for an adjuvant treatment.

Aim: The aim of the analysis was, based on the data of an observational study, to determine the prognostic relevance of the isolated LVI.

Materials and methods: Patients after radical resection of rectal cancer with no hemangioinvasion were subdivided in three groups: I-no LVI, no lymph node metastases (LNM); II-positive LVI, no LNM; III-positive LNM. Five-year local recurrence rate, distant metastases-free and disease-free survival were determined uni- and multivariate.

Results: Patients, n = 846, were studied (I, n = 471; II, n = 75; III, n = 300). The univariate comparison between the groups revealed the following 5-year results: local recurrence rate: 9.4 vs 10.0 vs 14.0%; distant metastases-free survival: 84.1 vs 82.5 vs 49.3%; disease-free survival: 83.2 vs 80.7 vs 45.5%. The differences between groups I and III were significant, but not between groups I and II. The determined higher disease-free survival rate in group II vs group III was significant (P = 0.041), but the differences in local recurrence rate and rate of distant metastases did not reach statistical significance. The multivariate analysis revealed no impact of the isolated LVI on the oncological outcome.

Conclusion: The isolated LVI has no independent prognostic impact on the local recurrence rate and long-term survival after radical resection of rectal cancer. Based on this finding, no indication for an adjuvant treatment in these patients can be derived.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Surg. 2005 Jun;189(6):707-13 - PubMed
    1. Chirurg. 2002 Feb;73(2):138-45; discussion 145-6 - PubMed
    1. Anat Embryol (Berl). 2001 Nov;204(5):399-406 - PubMed
    1. Microsc Res Tech. 2001 Oct 15;55(2):61-9 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Aug;48(8):1588-96 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources