Molecular karyotyping of patients with MCA/MR: the blurred boundary between normal and pathogenic variation
- PMID: 17124404
- DOI: 10.1159/000095918
Molecular karyotyping of patients with MCA/MR: the blurred boundary between normal and pathogenic variation
Abstract
Molecular karyotyping has revealed that microdeletions/duplications in the human genome are a major cause of multiple congenital anomalies associated with mental retardation (MCA/MR). The identification of a de novo chromosomal imbalance in a patient with MCA/MR is usually considered causal for the phenotype while a chromosomal imbalance inherited from a phenotypically normal parent is considered as a benign variation and not related to the disorder. Around 40% of imbalances in patients with MCA/MR in this series is inherited from a healthy parent and the majority of these appear to be (extremely) rare variants. As some of these contain known disease-causing genes and have also been found to be de novo in MCA/MR patients, this challenges the general view that such familial variants are innocent and of no major phenotypic consequence. Rather, we argue, that human genomes can be tolerant of genomic copy number variations depending on the genetic and environmental background and that different mechanisms play a role in determining whether these chromosomal imbalances manifest themselves.
Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Similar articles
-
Structural chromosomal abnormalities in patients with mental retardation and/or multiple congenital anomalies: a new series of 24 patients.Genet Couns. 2012;23(2):289-96. Genet Couns. 2012. PMID: 22876589
-
Subtelomeric imbalances in phenotypically normal individuals.Hum Mutat. 2007 Oct;28(10):958-67. doi: 10.1002/humu.20537. Hum Mutat. 2007. PMID: 17492636
-
Using a combination of MLPA kits to detect chromosomal imbalances in patients with multiple congenital anomalies and mental retardation is a valuable choice for developing countries.Eur J Med Genet. 2011 Jul-Aug;54(4):e425-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 Mar 30. Eur J Med Genet. 2011. PMID: 21457803
-
Pathogenic or not? Assessing the clinical relevance of copy number variants.Clin Genet. 2013 Nov;84(5):415-21. doi: 10.1111/cge.12242. Epub 2013 Aug 21. Clin Genet. 2013. PMID: 23895381 Review.
-
Clinical utility of array CGH for the detection of chromosomal imbalances associated with mental retardation and multiple congenital anomalies.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jan;1151:157-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.03610.x. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009. PMID: 19154522 Review.
Cited by
-
What's new in karyotyping? The move towards array comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH).Eur J Pediatr. 2007 Jul;166(7):637-43. doi: 10.1007/s00431-007-0463-6. Epub 2007 Mar 20. Eur J Pediatr. 2007. PMID: 17372759 Review.
-
A Multicentric Brazilian Investigative Study of Copy Number Variations in Patients with Congenital Anomalies and Intellectual Disability.Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 6;8(1):13382. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31754-2. Sci Rep. 2018. PMID: 30190605 Free PMC article.
-
A new diagnostic workflow for patients with mental retardation and/or multiple congenital abnormalities: test arrays first.Eur J Hum Genet. 2009 Nov;17(11):1394-402. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2009.74. Epub 2009 May 13. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009. PMID: 19436329 Free PMC article.
-
Benign copy number changes in clinical cytogenetic diagnostics by array CGH.Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008;123(1-4):94-101. doi: 10.1159/000184696. Epub 2009 Mar 11. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2008. PMID: 19287143 Free PMC article.
-
Practical guidelines for interpreting copy number gains detected by high-resolution array in routine diagnostics.Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 Feb;20(2):161-5. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.174. Epub 2011 Sep 21. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012. PMID: 21934709 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials