Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2007 Jan;110(1):5-13.
doi: 10.1007/s00113-006-1203-5.

[Functional and aesthetic refinements of free flap coverage at the dorsum of the hand and distal forearm]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

[Functional and aesthetic refinements of free flap coverage at the dorsum of the hand and distal forearm]

[Article in German]
T Gohla et al. Unfallchirurg. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: Free coverage of exposed functional structures of the hand and distal forearm can be achieved using a variety of free flaps. However, there is a lack of data in the literature which tissue components are best used for defect coverage of this specific area regarding aspects such as tendon gliding and tissue elasticity. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare and to evaluate the functional and aesthetical results using free cutaneous, fascial and muscle flaps.

Patients and methods: Between 1994 and 2002, a total of 56 patients underwent free flap coverage at the dorsal side of the hand and forearm at our institution. Of these patients, 20 with 21 free flaps met the study criteria and were available for follow-up examination. Depending on the tissue component used patients were allocated into three different groups. In group 1 eight patients received a fascial flap, in group 2 eight a cutaneous flap and in group 3 five a muscle flap. The mean follow-up was 50 months (range: 4-103 months). At follow-up examination the patients answered the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ 8) and the DASH questionnaire.

Results: Regarding range of motion of the wrist and fingers, fascial flaps clearly showed the best results. Concerning grip strength and pinch grip, fascial and cutaneous flaps demonstrated the same results. Patients with cutaneous flaps showed the best DASH score. Regarding the overall aesthetical outcome, fascial and cutaneous flaps were far better than muscle flaps. Donor site morbidity was lowest for fascial flaps followed by muscle flaps and was highest for cutaneous flaps.

Conclusion: Cutaneous and fascial flaps had the best functional and aesthetical results. Fascial flaps achieved the best aesthetical outcome of the donor site. We recommend free fascial flaps and cutaneous flaps as the first choice due to their advantages in the specific area of the dorsal site of the hand and distal forearm which requires pliable and thin tissue coverage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1980 Aug;66(2):204-9 - PubMed
    1. Burns. 2001 Feb;27(1):75-80 - PubMed
    1. J Reconstr Microsurg. 1999 Jul;15(5):315-20 - PubMed
    1. Br J Plast Surg. 2001 Jul;54(5):423-7 - PubMed
    1. Ann Plast Surg. 1995 Dec;35(6):595-600 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources