[Functional and aesthetic refinements of free flap coverage at the dorsum of the hand and distal forearm]
- PMID: 17124616
- DOI: 10.1007/s00113-006-1203-5
[Functional and aesthetic refinements of free flap coverage at the dorsum of the hand and distal forearm]
Abstract
Introduction: Free coverage of exposed functional structures of the hand and distal forearm can be achieved using a variety of free flaps. However, there is a lack of data in the literature which tissue components are best used for defect coverage of this specific area regarding aspects such as tendon gliding and tissue elasticity. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare and to evaluate the functional and aesthetical results using free cutaneous, fascial and muscle flaps.
Patients and methods: Between 1994 and 2002, a total of 56 patients underwent free flap coverage at the dorsal side of the hand and forearm at our institution. Of these patients, 20 with 21 free flaps met the study criteria and were available for follow-up examination. Depending on the tissue component used patients were allocated into three different groups. In group 1 eight patients received a fascial flap, in group 2 eight a cutaneous flap and in group 3 five a muscle flap. The mean follow-up was 50 months (range: 4-103 months). At follow-up examination the patients answered the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ 8) and the DASH questionnaire.
Results: Regarding range of motion of the wrist and fingers, fascial flaps clearly showed the best results. Concerning grip strength and pinch grip, fascial and cutaneous flaps demonstrated the same results. Patients with cutaneous flaps showed the best DASH score. Regarding the overall aesthetical outcome, fascial and cutaneous flaps were far better than muscle flaps. Donor site morbidity was lowest for fascial flaps followed by muscle flaps and was highest for cutaneous flaps.
Conclusion: Cutaneous and fascial flaps had the best functional and aesthetical results. Fascial flaps achieved the best aesthetical outcome of the donor site. We recommend free fascial flaps and cutaneous flaps as the first choice due to their advantages in the specific area of the dorsal site of the hand and distal forearm which requires pliable and thin tissue coverage.
Similar articles
-
[Defect coverage of the hand with the free serratus fascial flap].Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2005 Jun;37(3):186-92. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-837700. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2005. PMID: 15997430 German.
-
Fascial flaps based on perforators for reconstruction of defects in the distal forearm.Br J Plast Surg. 1999 Oct;52(7):534-40. doi: 10.1054/bjps.1999.3170. Br J Plast Surg. 1999. PMID: 10658106
-
Refining outcomes in dorsal hand coverage: consideration of aesthetics and donor-site morbidity.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Nov;126(5):1630-1638. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ef8ea3. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010. PMID: 21042118
-
Free distal volar forearm perforator flap: clinical application in digital reconstruction.ANZ J Surg. 2014 Jun;84(6):459-63. doi: 10.1111/ans.12172. Epub 2013 Apr 18. ANZ J Surg. 2014. PMID: 23601156 Review.
-
Versatility of the island forearm flap in the management of extensive skin defects of the hand.Injury. 2008 Sep;39 Suppl 3:S49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.06.007. Epub 2008 Aug 23. Injury. 2008. PMID: 18723169 Review.
Cited by
-
The free lateral arm flap-a reliable option for reconstruction of the forearm and hand.Hand (N Y). 2012 Jun;7(2):163-71. doi: 10.1007/s11552-012-9395-3. Hand (N Y). 2012. PMID: 23730235 Free PMC article.
-
The evolution of the pedicled radial forearm flap.Hand (N Y). 2010 Mar;5(1):37-42. doi: 10.1007/s11552-009-9231-6. Epub 2009 Oct 14. Hand (N Y). 2010. PMID: 19826879 Free PMC article.
-
[Applications of free lateral arm flap for hand and forearm defect reconstruction].Unfallchirurg. 2010 Oct;113(10):821-31. doi: 10.1007/s00113-010-1846-0. Unfallchirurg. 2010. PMID: 20827545 German.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous