Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1991 May;41(5):702-16.
doi: 10.2165/00003495-199141050-00003.

Current pharmacological treatment approaches to central nervous system leukaemia

Affiliations
Review

Current pharmacological treatment approaches to central nervous system leukaemia

S M Blaney et al. Drugs. 1991 May.

Abstract

Significant advances in the treatment and prevention of meningeal leukaemia have been made in the past 3 decades. This progress has resulted from the development of innovative approaches to treatment as well as a better understanding of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the commonly used antileukaemic agents. Intrathecal therapy, via the intralumbar or intraventricular route, is a form of regional therapy that results in the delivery of very high drug concentrations to the principle target tumour site (the meninges) using a relatively small drug dose, thereby minimising both systemic drug exposure and systemic toxicity. The dosage and schedules, clinical pharmacology and toxicities of the commonly used intrathecal agents, methotrexate and cytarabine (cytosine arabinoside; Ara-C) are discussed in detail. Another approach which has been used to overcome the poor penetration of antileukaemic drugs into the CNS has been the use of high-dose systemic therapy. This strategy has been successfully applied in the treatment of meningeal leukaemia using both high-dose methotrexate and high-dose cytarabine. The clinical pharmacology, toxicities, and potential limitations of this approach are outlined. Finally, new agents that are currently undergoing clinical evaluation and future directions for research are also discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cancer Res. 1983 Dec;43(12 Pt 1):6102-5 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1985 Apr;3(4):485-9 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 1989 Oct;7(10):1539-44 - PubMed
    1. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1989 Spring;11(1):74-86 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 1970 Aug;26(2):404-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources