Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Dec;15 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv4-8.
doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.016667.

The Tobacco Deposition and Trial Testimony Archive (DATTA) project: origins, aims, and methods

Affiliations
Review

The Tobacco Deposition and Trial Testimony Archive (DATTA) project: origins, aims, and methods

Ronald M Davis et al. Tob Control. 2006 Dec.

Abstract

Research on previously secret tobacco industry documents has grown substantially during the past decade, since these documents first became available as the result of private and governmental litigation and investigations by the US Congress and the US Food and Drug Administration. Complementary research on tobacco litigation testimony is now being conducted through the Tobacco Deposition and Trial Testimony Archive (DATTA) project. We obtained transcripts of depositions and trial testimony, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, and other litigation documents from law firms, court reporter firms, individual lawyers and witnesses, tobacco company websites, and other sources. As of 3 March 2006, the publicly available collection of DATTA (http://tobaccodocuments.org/datta) contained 4850 transcripts of depositions and trial testimony, including a total of about 820,000 transcript pages. Transcripts covered testimony from 1957 to 2005 (85% were for testimony from 1990 to 2005) given by more than 1500 witnesses in a total of 232 lawsuits. Twelve research teams were established to study the transcripts, with each team covering a particular topic (for example, the health consequences of tobacco use, addiction and pharmacology, tobacco advertising and promotion, tobacco-product design and manufacture, economic impact of tobacco use, youth initiation of tobacco use, and public understanding of the risks of tobacco use and exposure to second-hand smoke). The teams used qualitative research methods to analyse the documents, and their initial findings are published throughout this journal supplement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Dr Davis has served as an expert witness in several tobacco‐related lawsuits. He has derived no personal income from this work, but his employer (Henry Ford Health System) has charged a fee to secure compensation for his time lost from work due to his service as an expert witness. As president of Tobacco Control Law and Policy Consulting, Mr Douglas has provided service and consultation to law firms that have filed lawsuits against tobacco companies, including acting as co‐counsel in some of those cases.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Annas G J. Tobacco litigation as cancer prevention: Dealing with the devil. N Engl J Med 1997336304–308. - PubMed
    1. Douglas C E, Davis R M, Beasley J K. Epidemiology of the third wave of tobacco litigation in the United States, 1994–2005. Tob Control 200615(suppl IV)iv9–NaN16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Daynard R. Why tobacco litigation? Tob Control 2003121–2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anon President Clinton makes tobacco documents more accessible to the public. Press release, July 17, 1998. http://hhs.gov/news/press/1998pres/980716a.html (Accessed 2 March 2006)
    1. Memorandum for the Secretary of Health and Human Services Subject: Public availability of tobacco products. 17 July 1988. http://www.clintonfoundation.org/legacy/071798‐presidential‐memo‐on‐publ... (Accessed 17 March 2006)

Publication types