Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Nov;56(532):842-7.

Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial

Brian McKinstry  1 , Janet Hanley, David Heaney, Lucy McCloughan, Rob Elton, David J Webb
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial

Brian McKinstry et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is generally poorly controlled in primary care. One possible intervention for improving control is the harnessing of patient expertise through education and encouragement to challenge their care.

Aim: To determine whether encouraging patients to manage their hypertension in an 'expert' manner, by providing them with information in a clear clinical guideline, coupled with an explicit exhortation to become involved in and to challenge their own care if appropriate, would improve their care.

Design of study: Single blind randomised controlled trial of detailed guideline versus standard information.

Setting: Single urban general practice over 1 year.

Method: Patient-held guideline with written explicit exhortation to challenge care when appropriate. Two hundred and ninety-four of 536 eligible patients on the practice hypertension register were recruited, all of whom were randomised into one of two groups. Two hundred and thirty-six patients completed the study.

Primary outcome: average systolic blood pressure.

Secondary outcomes: proportion of patients with blood pressure < 150 mmHg systolic and < 90 mmHg diastolic, average cholesterol, proportion of patients prescribed statins and aspirin according to guideline, hospital anxiety and depression score. No clinically, or statistically significant differences were found between intervention and control with respect to all parameters or in anxiety and depression levels. Statin and aspirin use improved throughout the course of the study in both groups. Statin use showed a trend (P = 0.02) in favour of control.

Conclusion: In this study there was no clinically significant perceived benefit to patients as a result of providing them with a hypertension guideline. Patient guidelines are currently planned for many chronic illnesses. It is important to determine the utility of such interventions before scarce resources are applied to them.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Participant flow chart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Mulrow CD, Pignone M. What are the elements of good treatment for hypertension? BMJ. 2001;322(1107):1109. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Williams B, Poulter NR, Brown MJ, et al. The BHS Guidelines Working Party. British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management, 2004 — BHS IV: Summary. BMJ. 2004;328:634–640. - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Society of Hypertension 2003. European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2004;21(6):1011–1053. - PubMed
    1. Frijling B, Spies TH, Lobo CM, et al. Blood pressure control in treated hypertensive patients: clinical performance of General Practitioners. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51(462):9–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Primatesta P, Poulter N. Hypertension management and control among English adults aged 65 years and older in 2000 and 2001. J Hypertens. 2004;22(6):1093–1098. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances