Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Nov;56(532):869-75.

Communication between South Asian patients and GPs: comparative study using the Roter Interactional Analysis System

Richard D Neal  1 , Nasreen Ali, Karl Atkin, Victoria L Allgar, Shahid Ali, Tim Coleman
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Communication between South Asian patients and GPs: comparative study using the Roter Interactional Analysis System

Richard D Neal et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The UK South Asian population has poorer health outcomes. Little is known about their process of care in general practice, or in particular the process of communication with GPs.

Aim: To compare the ways in which white and South Asian patients communicate with white GPs.

Design of study: Observational study of video-recorded consultations using the Roter Interactional Analysis System (RIAS).

Setting: West Yorkshire, UK.

Method: One hundred and eighty-three consultations with 11 GPs in West Yorkshire, UK were video-recorded and analysed.

Results: Main outcome measures were consultation length, verbal domination, 16 individual abridged RIAS categories, and three composite RIAS categories; with comparisons between white patients, South Asian patients fluent in English and South Asian patients nonfluent in English. South Asians fluent in English had the shortest consultations and South Asians non-fluent in English the longest consultations (one-way ANOVA F = 7.173, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in verbal domination scores between the three groups. White patients had more affective (emotional) consultations than South Asian patients, and played a more active role in their consultations, as did their GPs. GPs spent less time giving information to South Asian patients who were not fluent in English and more time asking questions. GPs spent less time giving information to South Asian patients fluent in English compared with white patients.

Conclusions: These findings were expected between patients fluent and non-fluent in English but do demonstrate their nature. The differences between white patients and South Asian patients fluent in English warrant further explanation. How much of this was due to systematic differences in behaviour by the GPs, or was in response to patients' differing needs and expectations is unknown. These differences may contribute to differences in health outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roter DL, Hall JA. Doctors talking to patients, patients talking with doctors: improving communication in medical visits. Dover: Auburn House; 1992.
    1. Ong LML, de Haes JCJM, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor–patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40:903–918. - PubMed
    1. Stewart M. Studies of health outcomes and patient-centred communication. In: Stewart M, Weston WW, Brown JB, et al., editors. Patient centred medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995. pp. 117–131.
    1. Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD. Physician–patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002;15:25–38. - PubMed
    1. Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE., Jr Assessing the effects of physician–patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care. 1989;27:S110–27. - PubMed

Publication types