Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2007 May;56(5):615-20.
doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.107714. Epub 2006 Nov 29.

Prevalence of oesophageal eosinophils and eosinophilic oesophagitis in adults: the population-based Kalixanda study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Prevalence of oesophageal eosinophils and eosinophilic oesophagitis in adults: the population-based Kalixanda study

Jukka Ronkainen et al. Gut. 2007 May.

Abstract

Background: Eosinophilic oesophagitis may be increasing but the prevalence in the general population remains unknown. Our aim was to assess this and the presence of eosinophils in the distal oesophageal epithelium in the community.

Methods: Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed in a random sample (n = 1000) of the adult Swedish population (mean age 54 years, 49% men). Oesophageal biopsy samples were obtained from 2 cm above, and at, the Z-line. Any eosinophil infiltration of the epithelium was defined as "eosinophils present". Definite eosinophilic oesophagitis was defined as > or =20, probable as 15-19, and possible as 5-14 eosinophils/high-power field (HPF, at magnification x 40) in oesophageal biopsy specimens.

Results: Eosinophils were present in 48 subjects (4.8%, 95% CI 3.5 to 6.1%, mean age 54 years, 63% men), in 54% without troublesome reflux symptoms. Definite eosinophilic oesophagitis was present in four subjects (0.4%, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.8%, mean age 51 years, 75% men) and probable eosinophilic oesophagitis in seven subjects (0.7%, 95% CI 0.2 to 1.2%, mean age 58 years, 43% men). Erosive oesophagitis (OR = 2.99, 95% CI 1.58 to 5.66) and absence of dyspepsia (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.75) and Helicobacter pylori infection (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.92) were independent predictors for "eosinophils present". Definite eosinophilic oesophagitis was associated with dysphagia (2/66 vs 2/926, p = 0.025), and probable eosinophilic oesophagitis with narrowing of the oesophageal lumen (2/15 vs 5/978, p = 0.005).

Conclusions: Oesophageal eosinophils were present in nearly 5% of the general population; approximately 1% had definite or probable eosinophilic oesophagitis. Oesophageal eosinophils may be a manifestation of reflux disease in adults, but the condition is as likely to be asymptomatic and go unrecognised.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Landres R T, Kuster G G, Strum W B. Eosinophilic esophagitis in a patient with vigorous achalasia. Gastroenterology 1978741298–1301. - PubMed
    1. Attwood S E, Smyrk T C, Demeester T R.et al Esophageal eosinophilia with dysphagia. A distinct clinicopathologic syndrome. Dig Dis Sci 199338109–116. - PubMed
    1. Fox V L, Nurko S, Furuta G T. Eosinophilic esophagitis: it's not just kid's stuff. Gastrointest Endosc 200256260–270. - PubMed
    1. Vasilopoulos S, Murphy P, Auerbach A.et al The small‐caliber esophagus: an unappreciated cause of dysphagia for solids in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastrointest Endosc 20025599–106. - PubMed
    1. Potter J W, Saeian K, Staff D.et al Eosinophilic esophagitis in adults: an emerging problem with unique esophageal features. Gastrointest Endosc 200459355–361. - PubMed

Publication types