Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Aug 15;70(4):73.
doi: 10.5688/aj700473.

Characteristics, prevalence, attitudes, and perceptions of academic dishonesty among pharmacy students

Affiliations

Characteristics, prevalence, attitudes, and perceptions of academic dishonesty among pharmacy students

Suzanne M Rabi et al. Am J Pharm Educ. .

Abstract

Objectives: To ascertain background factors that influence pharmacy students' willingness to cheat, describe attitudes regarding methods of cheating, assess prevalence of cheating and determine atmospheres that may aid in preventing academic dishonesty.

Methods: Third-professional year PharmD students at 4 institutions participated in a survey administered by a class representative.

Results: Of the 296 students who completed survey instruments, 16.3% admitted to cheating during pharmacy school. Approximately 74% admitted that either they or their classmates had worked on an individual assignment with a friend. Students who cheated during high school or in a prepharmacy program were more likely to cheat during pharmacy school (p < 0.0001). Those who possessed a bachelor of science (BS) degree prior to pharmacy school were less likely to cheat (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Academic dishonesty is prevalent among pharmacy students. While few respondents directly admitted to cheating, many admitted to activities traditionally defined as dishonest.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Davis SF, Grover CA, Becker AH, McGregor LN. Academic dishonesty: prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teach Psychol. 1992;19:16–20.
    1. Sierles F, Hendrickx I, Circle S. Cheating in medical school. J Med Educ. 1980;55:124–5. - PubMed
    1. Kleiner C, Lord M. The cheating game. US News & World Report. 1999;127(20):54–66.
    1. Gaberson KB. Academic dishonesty among nursing students. Nurs Forum. 1997;32:14–20. - PubMed
    1. McCabe DL, Trevino LK. Individual and contextual influences on dishonesty: a multicampus investigation. Res High Educ. 1997;38:379–96.

LinkOut - more resources