Characteristics, prevalence, attitudes, and perceptions of academic dishonesty among pharmacy students
- PMID: 17136192
- PMCID: PMC1636980
- DOI: 10.5688/aj700473
Characteristics, prevalence, attitudes, and perceptions of academic dishonesty among pharmacy students
Abstract
Objectives: To ascertain background factors that influence pharmacy students' willingness to cheat, describe attitudes regarding methods of cheating, assess prevalence of cheating and determine atmospheres that may aid in preventing academic dishonesty.
Methods: Third-professional year PharmD students at 4 institutions participated in a survey administered by a class representative.
Results: Of the 296 students who completed survey instruments, 16.3% admitted to cheating during pharmacy school. Approximately 74% admitted that either they or their classmates had worked on an individual assignment with a friend. Students who cheated during high school or in a prepharmacy program were more likely to cheat during pharmacy school (p < 0.0001). Those who possessed a bachelor of science (BS) degree prior to pharmacy school were less likely to cheat (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Academic dishonesty is prevalent among pharmacy students. While few respondents directly admitted to cheating, many admitted to activities traditionally defined as dishonest.
References
-
- Davis SF, Grover CA, Becker AH, McGregor LN. Academic dishonesty: prevalence, determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teach Psychol. 1992;19:16–20.
-
- Sierles F, Hendrickx I, Circle S. Cheating in medical school. J Med Educ. 1980;55:124–5. - PubMed
-
- Kleiner C, Lord M. The cheating game. US News & World Report. 1999;127(20):54–66.
-
- Gaberson KB. Academic dishonesty among nursing students. Nurs Forum. 1997;32:14–20. - PubMed
-
- McCabe DL, Trevino LK. Individual and contextual influences on dishonesty: a multicampus investigation. Res High Educ. 1997;38:379–96.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources