Using performance-based assessments to evaluate parity between a campus and distance education pathway
- PMID: 17136209
- PMCID: PMC1636977
- DOI: 10.5688/aj700490
Using performance-based assessments to evaluate parity between a campus and distance education pathway
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the performance of campus-based students with that of distance students during the first 2 years of a doctor of pharmacy program to evaluate parity between the pathways.
Methods: Twelve cases were created for each year of the program along with performance criteria. The cases were converted into computer-based simulations for programmatic assessment at the end of the 2002-2003 and 2003-2004 school years. All first-professional year (P1) and second-professional year (P2) students participated in the assessments. Overall class means were calculated and used to compare student performances between campus and distance education pathways.
Results: Overall scores for the 2003 P1 class were 56.4% for the campus-based students and 62.4% for the distance students, (p = 0.002); overall scores for the 2003 P2 class were 48.8% and 55.5%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The 2004 overall scores for P1 campus and distance students were 59.0% and 65.7%, respectively, (p = 0.001); and for 2004 P2 scores the results were 51.8% and 56.5%, respectively (p = 0.049).
Conclusions: Students receiving their pharmacy education via a distance pathway scored higher on performance-based assessments compared with students receiving their pharmacy education via the traditional campus-based pathway. This indicates that distance students are receiving at least an equivalent curricular experience in the P1 and P2 years compared to that received by campus-based students.
References
-
- Pedersen CA, Doucette WR, Gaither CA, Mott DA, Schommer JC. Final Report of the National Pharmacist Workforce Survey: 2000. Available at: http://www.aacp.org/site/page.asp?TRACKID=&VID=1&CID=360&DID=3490 Accessed September 7, 2005.
-
- Davison M, Medina MS. Addressing industry needs through innovative technologies. Am J Pharm Educ. 2003;67(3):3–4. Article 100.
-
- Malone PM, Glynn GE, Stohs SJ. The development and structure of a web-based entry-level Doctor of Pharmacy pathway at Creighton University medical center. Am J Pharm Educ. 2004;68 Article 46.
-
- Monaghan MS, Jones RM. Faculty Case Writing Teams. Designing an assessment for an abilities-based curriculum. Am J Pharm Educ. 2005;69(Article 19):118–25.
-
- Stillman PL, Gillers MA. Clinical performance evaluation in medicine and law. In: Berk RA, editor. Performance Assessment: Methods and Applications. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press;; 1986. pp. 393–445.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources