Hysteresis of a biomaterial: influence of sutures and biological adhesives
- PMID: 17136602
- DOI: 10.1007/s10856-006-0009-x
Hysteresis of a biomaterial: influence of sutures and biological adhesives
Abstract
We studied the changes in energy consumption of samples of calf pericardium, when joined or not joined by sutures and adhesives, by means of hysteretic cycles. Sixty-four samples were subsequently subjected to tensile stress until rupture. An overlapping suture sewn in the form of a rectangle presented an acceptable mean resistance to rupture of over 10 MPa, although lower than the mean values in an unsutured control series where the mean resistance surpassed 15 MPa. The contribution of an acrylic adhesive to the resistance to rupture was negligible. The sutured samples that were reinforced with adhesives and had not been subjected to hysteretic cycles prior to rupture showed an anisotropic behavior. This behavior appeared to be lost in all the samples that underwent hysteretic cycles. We found an inflection point in the stress/strain curve following the stepwise increase in the load, with a value greater than and proximate to the final load applied. This inflection should be analyzed by means of microscopy. Finally, the mathematical relationship between the energy consumed and the stress applied, the strain or deformation produced and the number of cycles of hysteresis to which the samples were subjected was established as the ultimate objective of this study. The bonding systems provoked a greater consumption of energy, with the greatest consumption corresponding to the first cycle in all the series assayed. An equation relating the energy consumption in a sample to the number of hysteretic cycles to which it was subjected was obtained. Its asymptote on the x-axis indicates the energy consumption for a theoretical number of cycles, making it possible to estimate the durability of the sample.
Similar articles
-
Resistance and stability of a new method for bonding biological materials using sutures and biological adhesives.J Biomater Appl. 2005 Jan;19(3):215-36. doi: 10.1177/0885328205046633. J Biomater Appl. 2005. PMID: 15613381
-
Influence of the selection of the suture material on the mechanical behavior of a biomaterial to be employed in the construction of implants. Part 1: Calf pericardium.J Biomater Appl. 2001 Jul;16(1):47-67. doi: 10.1106/GNCT-31PT-JHKJ-FPX5. J Biomater Appl. 2001. PMID: 11475359
-
Mechanical behavior of chemically treated ostrich pericardium subjected to uniaxial tensile testing: influence of the suture.J Biomed Mater Res. 2002 Oct;62(1):73-81. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10266. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002. PMID: 12124788
-
The telescoping suture--Part 1: Does this technique improve the mechanical behavior of a biomaterial?: Calf pericardium.J Biomater Appl. 2002 Oct;17(2):85-103. doi: 10.1106/088532802027863. J Biomater Appl. 2002. PMID: 12557996
-
Influence of the selection of the suture material on the mechanical behavior of a biomaterial to be employed in the construction of implants. Part 2: Porcine pericardium.J Biomater Appl. 2001 Jul;16(1):68-90. doi: 10.1106/3JXM-UTPN-PXTG-72DT. J Biomater Appl. 2001. PMID: 11475360
Cited by
-
Characterization of mechanical properties of pericardium tissue using planar biaxial tension and flexural deformation.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Jan;77:148-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.039. Epub 2017 Sep 13. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018. PMID: 28915471 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of cyclic deformation on xenogeneic heart valve biomaterials.PLoS One. 2019 Jun 13;14(6):e0214656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214656. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31194770 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of transcatheter heart valve biomaterials: Biomechanical characterization of bovine and porcine pericardium.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017 Nov;75:486-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.08.013. Epub 2017 Aug 9. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017. PMID: 28826102 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources