Clinical guidelines: quality and implementation
- PMID: 17137066
Clinical guidelines: quality and implementation
Abstract
So far 60 evidence-based clinical guidelines have been developed in Finland. These are no binding rules, but they require interpretation for specific patients, and patient preferences are to be observed. For high-quality guidelines, surrogate markers must be avoided, evidence must be systematically searched for and presented, and local context has to be taken into account. The AGREE (Appraisal of Guideline Research & Evaluation) instrument for evaluation of guidelines is presented. Research on implementation and continuous evaluation of guideline effects are needed.
Similar articles
-
Possibilities for transborder cooperation in breast cancer care in Europe: a comparative analysis regarding the content, quality and evidence use of breast cancer guidelines.Breast. 2008 Oct;17(5):464-71. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 May 1. Breast. 2008. PMID: 18455399
-
Towards evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in Saudi Arabia.Saudi Med J. 2004 Nov;25(11):1555-8. Saudi Med J. 2004. PMID: 15573177
-
[AGREE II: assessing the quality of practice guidelines].Recenti Prog Med. 2011 May;102(5):217-9. doi: 10.1701/659.7672. Recenti Prog Med. 2011. PMID: 21607007 Italian.
-
A critical appraisal of 2007 American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (ACOEM) Practice Guidelines for Interventional Pain Management: an independent review utilizing AGREE, AMA, IOM, and other criteria.Pain Physician. 2008 May-Jun;11(3):291-310. Pain Physician. 2008. PMID: 18523501 Review.
-
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.Pain Physician. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):161-86. Pain Physician. 2008. PMID: 18354710 Review.