Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Feb;17(1):80-90.
doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2006.10.008. Epub 2006 Oct 26.

Spatial genome organization in the formation of chromosomal translocations

Affiliations
Review

Spatial genome organization in the formation of chromosomal translocations

Karen J Meaburn et al. Semin Cancer Biol. 2007 Feb.

Abstract

Chromosomal translocations and genomic instability are universal hallmarks of tumor cells. While the molecular mechanisms leading to the formation of translocations are rapidly being elucidated, a cell biological understanding of how chromosomes undergo translocations in the context of the cell nucleus in vivo is largely lacking. The recent realization that genomes are non-randomly arranged within the nuclear space has profound consequences for mechanisms of chromosome translocations. We review here the emerging principles of spatial genome organization and discuss the implications of non-random spatial genome organization for the genesis and specificity of cancerous chromosomal translocations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Formation of chromosomal translocations is a multi-step process
Chromosomal translocations form after double strand breaks (arrows) often inflicted by radiation or genotoxic chemicals. The repair machinery (purple, blue) is recruited to the double strand breaks, but if it fails to repair the damaged chromosome territories (red, green), they undergo illegitimate misjoining to form chimeric chromosomes.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spatial organization of genomes
The non-random arrangement of chromosomes and genes can be described as (A) radial position relative to the nuclear center or (B) relative position with respect to other chromosomes or genes. (A) The radial position of chromosomes has been correlated with either gene density (top) or chromosome size (bottom). (B) Chromosomes and genes may either be proximally or distally located relative to each other (top) and their position may be constrained by intranuclear structures such as the nucleolus (yellow).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spatial proximity in the formation of translocations
Increasing evidence suggests a link between relative spatial positioning of chromosomes and their frequency of translocation. Proximally positioned chromosome (red, green) undergo translocations at a higher frequency than distally positioned chromosomes (blue).
Figure 4
Figure 4. “Breakage-first” and “Contact-first” models for formation of chromosome translocations
(top) Breakage-first: Chromosomal translocations may either form by joining of DSBs in distantly located chromosomes. In this model the broken chromosome ends are able to diffuse over large distances to roam the nuclear space for possible translocation partners. (bottom) Contact-first: Translocations may preferentially form between already proximally positioned genome regions in which breaks occur.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mitelman F. Recurrent chromosome aberrations in cancer. Mutat Res. 2000;462:247–53. - PubMed
    1. Rowley JD. Chromosome translocations: dangerous liaisons revisited. Nat Rev Cancer. 2001;1:245–50. - PubMed
    1. Kanaar R, Hoeijmakers JH, van Gent DC. Molecular mechanisms of DNA double strand break repair. Trends Cell Biol. 1998;8:483–9. - PubMed
    1. Elliott B, Jasin M. Double-strand breaks and translocations in cancer. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2002;59:373–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Misteli T. Spatial positioning; a new dimension in genome function. Cell. 2004;119:153–6. - PubMed