Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects
- PMID: 17141320
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.065
Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in African American subjects
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained by dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in African Americans and to assess whether these measures were influenced by ocular parameters including corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and axial length.
Design: Observational clinical study.
Participants: The study included 176 eyes of 94 African Americans.
Methods: All participants underwent IOP evaluation with DCT and GAT, as well as measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature, corneal astigmatism, spherical equivalent, and axial length.
Main outcome measures: Univariate and multiple regression analyses were used to evaluate the associations between IOP (as measured with DCT and GAT) and CCT, corneal curvature, corneal astigmatism, spherical equivalent, axial length, and age. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement between IOP measurements obtained by DCT and GAT.
Results: In multiple regression analysis, GAT IOP measurements were significantly associated with CCT (P<0.001) and age (P = 0.003), whereas DCT IOP measurements were associated only with age (P = 0.027). The difference between DCT and GAT IOP measurements was significantly influenced by corneal thickness (P<0.001) and ocular pulse amplitude (OPA; P = 0.004). Patients with thick corneas tended to have higher GAT IOP measurements compared with DCT, whereas in patients with thin corneas, GAT IOP measurements tended to be lower than DCT measurements. Larger values of OPA were associated with a decrease in the difference between DCT and GAT measurements, whereas smaller values of OPA were associated with an increase in the difference between DCT and GAT measurements.
Conclusions: Dynamic contour tonometry measurements in African Americans seem to provide an estimate of IOP that is less influenced by corneal properties than those provided by GAT.
Similar articles
-
Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.Ophthalmology. 2007 Jan;114(1):20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.047. Epub 2006 Oct 27. Ophthalmology. 2007. PMID: 17070592
-
Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 May;85(3):272-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00834.x. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007. PMID: 17488456
-
Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.Eye (Lond). 2009 Feb;23(2):262-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703102. Epub 2008 Jan 25. Eye (Lond). 2009. PMID: 18219335
-
The influence of altitude on the differences between Goldmann tonometry and Pascal dynamic contour tonometry: An ecological meta-analysis.Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024 May 1;72(Suppl 3):S398-S403. doi: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_907_23. Epub 2023 Dec 15. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38099358 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Corneal and intraocular pressure changes associated to the circadian rhythms: a narrative review.Int J Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 18;17(10):1921-1928. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2024.10.20. eCollection 2024. Int J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 39430020 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in eyes with elevated intraocular pressure (IOP): comparison in the same eyes after subsequent medical normalization of IOP.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov;248(11):1611-6. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1462-2. Epub 2010 Jul 22. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010. PMID: 20652303
-
Intraocular pressure after Descemet's stripping and non-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;55(2):98-102. doi: 10.1007/s10384-010-0916-8. Epub 2011 Mar 13. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2011. PMID: 21400052
-
Measuring accurate IOPs: Does correction factor help or hurt?Clin Ophthalmol. 2010 Jul 21;4:611-6. doi: 10.2147/opth.s11105. Clin Ophthalmol. 2010. PMID: 20668723 Free PMC article.
-
Intraocular Pressure Measurements by Three Different Tonometers in Children with Aphakic Glaucoma and a Thick Cornea.Iran J Med Sci. 2014 Jan;39(1):11-9. Iran J Med Sci. 2014. PMID: 24453389 Free PMC article.
-
Interpretation of uniocular and binocular trials of glaucoma medications: an observational case series.BMC Ophthalmol. 2007 Oct 5;7:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2415-7-17. BMC Ophthalmol. 2007. PMID: 17916260 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources