Rosiglitazone versus bedtime insulin in the treatment of patients with conventional oral antidiabetic drug failure: a 1-year randomized clinical trial

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of rosiglitazone in the treatment of patients with secondary oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) failure and to directly compare its use with bedtime insulin. A total of 112 Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes and conventional OAD failure were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with rosiglitazone or bedtime isophane insulin; they continued to take their original oral antidiabetic drugs. Glycemic index, other clinical profiles, and tolerability were assessed during treatment and 1 y after add-on treatment was provided. Among the 112 patients, mean age (+/-SD) was 58.2+/-11.0 y (median, 58 y; range, 37 to 84 y). Both rosiglitazone (n=56) and insulin (n=56) significantly improved fasting glucose (2.4 and 3.7 mmol/L, respectively) and hemoglobin A1c concentrations (1.1% and 1.3%, respectively). Both therapies increased body mass index after 1 y of treatment (0.9 and 0.8 kg/m2, respectively). Only rosiglitazone increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations (0.1 mmol/L). Four patients (7.1%) who were given rosiglitazone developed adverse effects (2, ankle edema, and 2, gastrointestinal disturbance). Six insulin-treated patients (10.7%) described adverse effects (5, early morning hypoglycemia, and 1, anxiety). Investigators concluded that in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes and secondary conventional OAD failure, 1 y of treatment with rosiglitazone or bedtime insulin added to the regular regimen resulted in similar improvements in glycemic control. Rosiglitazone was also associated with improved high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. The addition of rosiglitazone may offer a safe and effective alternative to bedtime insulin treatment.