Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 May;56(5):677-84.
doi: 10.1136/gut.2006.095109. Epub 2006 Dec 1.

Option appraisal of population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes in England

Paul Tappenden  1 , James Chilcott, Simon Eggington, Julietta Patnick, Hannah Sakai, Jonathon Karnon
Affiliations

Option appraisal of population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes in England

Paul Tappenden et al. Gut. 2007 May.

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and resource impact of faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and flexible sigmoidoscopy (FSIG) screening options for colorectal cancer to inform the Department of Health's policy on bowel cancer screening in England.

Methods: We developed a state transition model to simulate the life experience of a cohort of individuals without polyps or cancer through to the development of adenomatous polyps and malignant carcinoma and subsequent death in the general population of England. The costs, effects and resource impact of five screening options were evaluated: (a) FOBT for individuals aged 50-69 (biennial screening); (b) FOBT for individuals aged 60-69 (biennial screening); (c) once-only FSIG for individuals aged 55; (d) once-only FSIG for individuals aged 60; and (e) once-only FSIG for individuals aged 60, followed by FOBT for individuals aged 61-70 (biennial screening).

Results: The model suggests that screening using FSIG with or without FOBT may be cost-saving and may produce additional benefits compared with a policy of no screening. The marginal cost-effectiveness of FOBT options compared to a policy of no screening is estimated to be below pound3000 per quality adjusted life year gained.

Conclusions: Screening using FOBT and/or FSIG is potentially a cost-effective strategy for the early detection of colorectal cancer. However, the practical feasibility of alternative screening programmes is inevitably limited by current pressures on endoscopy services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Office for National Statistics Cancer registration statistics 2000. Series MB1 No 31, 2003. Available from http://www.statistics.gov.uk (accessed 24 January 2007)
    1. Cancer Research U K. CancerStats Mortality ‐ UK 2005. Available from http://info.cancerresearchuk.org:8000/cancerstats/ (accessed 24 January 2007)
    1. Hardcastle J D. Randomised controlled trial of faecal‐occult‐blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 19963481472–1477. - PubMed
    1. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J.et al Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal‐occult‐blood test. Lancet 19963481467–1471. - PubMed
    1. Mandel J S, Bond J H, Church T R.et al Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. N Engl J Med 19933281365–1371. - PubMed