Racial and ethnic categories in biomedical research: there is no baby in the bathwater
- PMID: 17144171
- PMCID: PMC2271137
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2006.00061.x
Racial and ethnic categories in biomedical research: there is no baby in the bathwater
Abstract
The use of racial categories in biomedicine has had a long history in the United States. However, social hierarchy and discrimination, justified by purported scientific differences, has also plagued the history of racial categories. Because "race" has some correlation with biological and genetic characteristics, there has been a call not to "throw the baby out with the bathwater" by eliminating race as a research or clinical category. I argue that race is too undefined and fluid to be useful as a proxy for biology or genetics.
References
-
- Cohn J. The Use of Race and Ethnicity in Medicine: Letters from the African-American Heart Failure Trial. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2006;34(3):552–554. - PubMed
-
- Ossorio P, Duster T. Controversies in Biomedical, Behavioral, and Forensic Sciences. American Psychologist. 2005;60:115–128. - PubMed
- Duster T. Lessons From History: Why Race and Ethnicity Have Played a Major Role in Biomedical Research. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 2006;34(3):487–496. - PubMed
-
- Lee S, Mountain J, Koenig B. The Meanings of ‘race’ in the New Genomics: Implications for Health Disparities Research. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law and Ethics. 2001;1:33–75. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous