Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Dec;32(12):702-5.
doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.014910.

Doctor-patient sexual relationships in medical oaths

S G Pérez  1 , R J Gelpi, A M Rancich
Affiliations

Doctor-patient sexual relationships in medical oaths

S G Pérez et al. J Med Ethics. 2006 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Doctor-patient sexual relationship is considered to be unfair because the first party would be abusing the second party's vulnerability. The prohibition of this relationship is noted in the Hippocratic oath. Currently, a reprise of the use of oaths in medical schools can be observed.

Aim: To determine whether the prohibition has been maintained and how its expression has varied in the oaths during different periods.

Methods: 50 oaths were studied: 13 ancient-medieval and 37 modern-contemporary. Of the 50 texts, 19 were versions of the original oaths. The oaths that pointed out the prohibited doctor-patient relationship referred to any sexual aspect or included paragraphs that began as the Hippocratic oath does were noted.

Results: Of the 24 (48%) texts that expressed the prohibition, 8 (62%) were ancient-medieval and 16 (43%) were modern-contemporary. Some expressly call it Hippocratic oath, many use general terminology (corruption or vice) and others describe it in association with other commitments (abortion and euthanasia).

Conclusions: The clause on the prohibition of the doctor-patient sexual relationship in Hippocratic oath was included to be for legal, economic and social reasons at the time. That the clause is found mostly in the ancient-medieval oaths can be attributed to the influence of the original. This commitment is generalised and associated with others by contemporary formulas. Currently, sexual relationships are the subject of legal and ethical analysis and their inclusion in the oaths is being debated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Amundsen D. Ancient and medieval ethic. In: Reich WT, ed. Encyclopedia of bioethics. New York: The Free Press, 19951509–1515.
    1. Jones W.The doctor's oath: an essay in the history of medicine. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1924, 9–11, 23–5, 31–3, 60–1.
    1. Nutton V. What's in an oath? J R Coll Physicians Lond 199529518–525. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lara Nava M. Juramento. In: García Gual C, Lara Nava M, López Férez J, Cabellos Alvárez B, eds. Tratados Hipocráticos. Madrid: Biblioteca Clásica, 198363–83.
    1. Edelstein L. The Hippocratic oath: text, translation and interpretation. In: Veatch R, ed. Cross cultural perspectives in medical ethics: readings. Boston: Jones and Bartlett, 19896–24.

Publication types