Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations
- PMID: 17147810
- PMCID: PMC1697807
- DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-4-21
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 9. Grading evidence and recommendations
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO), like many other organisations around the world, has recognised the need to use more rigorous processes to ensure that health care recommendations are informed by the best available research evidence. This is the ninth of a series of 16 reviews that have been prepared as background for advice from the WHO Advisory Committee on Health Research to WHO on how to achieve this.
Objectives: We reviewed the literature on grading evidence and recommendations in guidelines.
Methods: We searched PubMed and three databases of methodological studies for existing systematic reviews and relevant methodological research. We did not conduct a full systematic review ourselves. Our conclusions are based on the available evidence, consideration of what WHO and other organisations are doing and logical arguments.
Key questions and answers: Should WHO grade the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations? Users of recommendations need to know how much confidence they can place in the underlying evidence and the recommendations. The degree of confidence depends on a number of factors and requires complex judgments. These judgments should be made explicitly in WHO recommendations. A systematic and explicit approach to making judgments about the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations can help to prevent errors, facilitate critical appraisal of these judgments, and can help to improve communication of this information. What criteria should be used to grade evidence and recommendations? Both the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations should be graded. The criteria used to grade the strength of recommendations should include the quality of the underlying evidence, but should not be limited to that. The approach to grading should be one that has wide international support and is suitable for a wide range of different types of recommendations. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, which is currently suggested in the Guidelines for WHO Guidelines, is being used by an increasing number of other organizations internationally. It should be used more consistently by WHO. Further developments of this approach should ensure its wide applicability. Should WHO use the same grading system for all of its recommendations? Although there are arguments for and against using the same grading system across a wide range of different types of recommendations, WHO should use a uniform grading system to prevent confusion for developers and users of recommendations.
Similar articles
-
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 1. Guidelines for guidelines.Health Res Policy Syst. 2006 Nov 21;4:13. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-4-13. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006. PMID: 17118181 Free PMC article.
-
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement.Health Res Policy Syst. 2006 Dec 5;4:22. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-4-22. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006. PMID: 17147811 Free PMC article.
-
Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 8. Synthesis and presentation of evidence.Health Res Policy Syst. 2006 Dec 5;4:20. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-4-20. Health Res Policy Syst. 2006. PMID: 17147809 Free PMC article.
-
Moving from evidence to developing recommendations in guidelines: article 11 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):282-92. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-064ST. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012. PMID: 23256172 Review.
-
Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome.Fertil Steril. 2018 Aug;110(3):364-379. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 Jul 19. Fertil Steril. 2018. PMID: 30033227 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Recommendations for culturally safe clinical kidney care for First Nations Australians: a guideline summary.Med J Aust. 2023 Oct 16;219(8):374-385. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52114. Med J Aust. 2023. PMID: 37838977 Free PMC article.
-
[The GRADE System. An international approach to standardize the graduation of evidence and recommendations in guidelines].Internist (Berl). 2008 Jun;49(6):673-80. doi: 10.1007/s00108-008-2141-9. Internist (Berl). 2008. PMID: 18461295 German.
-
The management of children with bronchiolitis in the Australasian hospital setting: development of a clinical practice guideline.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Feb 12;18(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0478-x. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018. PMID: 29433429 Free PMC article.
-
Use of the GRADE approach in health policymaking and evaluation: a scoping review of nutrition and physical activity policies.Implement Sci. 2020 May 24;15(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-00984-2. Implement Sci. 2020. PMID: 32448231 Free PMC article.
-
Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise.CMAJ. 2014 Feb 18;186(3):E123-42. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.131237. Epub 2013 Dec 16. CMAJ. 2014. PMID: 24344144 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources