Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Dec;20(8):769-77.
doi: 10.1177/0269216306072553.

Towards using administrative databases to measure population-based indicators of quality of end-of-life care: testing the methodology

Affiliations

Towards using administrative databases to measure population-based indicators of quality of end-of-life care: testing the methodology

Eva Grunfeld et al. Palliat Med. 2006 Dec.

Abstract

This study is concerned with methods to measure population-based indicators of quality end-of-life care. Using a retrospective cohort approach, we assessed the feasibility, validity and reliability of using administrative databases to measure quality indicators of end-of-life care in two Canadian provinces. The study sample consisted of all females who died of breast cancer between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2002, in Nova Scotia or Ontario, Canada. From an initial list of 19 quality indicators selected from the literature, seven were determined to be fully measurable in both provinces. An additional seven indicators in one province and three in the other province were partially measurable. Tests comparing administrative and chart data show a high level of agreement with inter-rater reliability, confirming consistency in the chart abstraction process. Using administrative data is an efficient, population-based method to monitor quality of care which can compliment other methods, such as qualitative and purposefully collected clinical data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blumenthal D. Quality of health care: Part 1: Quality of care – what is it? N Engl J Med. 1996;335:891–94. - PubMed
    1. Health Services Research Group. Quality of care: 1. What is quality and how can it be measured? CMAJ. 1992;146:2153–58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brook R, McGlynn E. Quality of health care: Part 2: Measuring quality of care. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:966–70. - PubMed
    1. Kahn K, Malin J, Adams J, et al. Developing a reliable, valid, and feasible plan for quality-of-care measurement for cancer: how should we measure? Med Care. 2002;40:III-73–85. - PubMed
    1. Pearson M, Ganz P, McGuigan K, et al. The cancer identification challenge in measuring quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:4353–60. - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding