Towards using administrative databases to measure population-based indicators of quality of end-of-life care: testing the methodology
- PMID: 17148531
- PMCID: PMC3741158
- DOI: 10.1177/0269216306072553
Towards using administrative databases to measure population-based indicators of quality of end-of-life care: testing the methodology
Abstract
This study is concerned with methods to measure population-based indicators of quality end-of-life care. Using a retrospective cohort approach, we assessed the feasibility, validity and reliability of using administrative databases to measure quality indicators of end-of-life care in two Canadian provinces. The study sample consisted of all females who died of breast cancer between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2002, in Nova Scotia or Ontario, Canada. From an initial list of 19 quality indicators selected from the literature, seven were determined to be fully measurable in both provinces. An additional seven indicators in one province and three in the other province were partially measurable. Tests comparing administrative and chart data show a high level of agreement with inter-rater reliability, confirming consistency in the chart abstraction process. Using administrative data is an efficient, population-based method to monitor quality of care which can compliment other methods, such as qualitative and purposefully collected clinical data.
Similar articles
-
Toward population-based indicators of quality end-of-life care: testing stakeholder agreement.Cancer. 2008 May 15;112(10):2301-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23428. Cancer. 2008. PMID: 18361447 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability assessment and findings of a newly developed quality measurement instrument: quality indicators of end-of-life cancer care from medical chart review at a Japanese regional cancer center.J Palliat Med. 2008 Jun;11(5):729-37. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0227. J Palliat Med. 2008. PMID: 18588405
-
Adherence to quality breast cancer survivorship care in four Canadian provinces: a CanIMPACT retrospective cohort study.BMC Cancer. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):659. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5882-z. BMC Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31272420 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying potential indicators of the quality of end-of-life cancer care from administrative data.J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 15;21(6):1133-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.059. J Clin Oncol. 2003. PMID: 12637481 Review.
-
Developing indicators of appropriate and inappropriate end-of-life care in people with Alzheimer's disease, cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for population-level administrative databases: A RAND/UCLA appropriateness study.Palliat Med. 2017 Dec;31(10):932-945. doi: 10.1177/0269216317705099. Epub 2017 Apr 21. Palliat Med. 2017. PMID: 28429629 Review.
Cited by
-
Dying among older adults in Switzerland: who dies in hospital, who dies in a nursing home?BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Sep 23;15(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0156-x. BMC Palliat Care. 2016. PMID: 27662830 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Associated with End-of-Life Health Service Use in Patients Dying of Cancer.Healthc Policy. 2010 Feb;5(3):e125-43. Healthc Policy. 2010. PMID: 21286260 Free PMC article.
-
Delivery of health care at the end of life in cancer patients of four swiss cantons: a retrospective database study (SAKK 89/09).BMC Cancer. 2014 May 1;14:306. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-306. BMC Cancer. 2014. PMID: 24885104 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in end-of-life cancer care in the Medicare program.J Geriatr Oncol. 2016 Mar;7(2):116-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2015.11.007. Epub 2016 Jan 15. J Geriatr Oncol. 2016. PMID: 26783015 Free PMC article.
-
Quantifying limitations in chemotherapy data in administrative health databases: implications for measuring the quality of colorectal cancer care.Healthc Policy. 2011 Aug;7(1):32-40. Healthc Policy. 2011. PMID: 22851984 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Blumenthal D. Quality of health care: Part 1: Quality of care – what is it? N Engl J Med. 1996;335:891–94. - PubMed
-
- Brook R, McGlynn E. Quality of health care: Part 2: Measuring quality of care. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:966–70. - PubMed
-
- Kahn K, Malin J, Adams J, et al. Developing a reliable, valid, and feasible plan for quality-of-care measurement for cancer: how should we measure? Med Care. 2002;40:III-73–85. - PubMed
-
- Pearson M, Ganz P, McGuigan K, et al. The cancer identification challenge in measuring quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:4353–60. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical