The effect of dose rate on radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low-LET radiation
- PMID: 17149982
- DOI: 10.1667/RR0682.1
The effect of dose rate on radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low-LET radiation
Abstract
The dependence of the incidence of radiation-induced cancer on the dose rate of the radiation exposure is a question of considerable importance to the estimation of risk of cancer induction by low-dose-rate radiation. Currently a dose and dose-rate effectiveness factor (DDREF) is used to convert high-dose-rate risk estimates to low dose rates. In this study, the end point of neoplastic transformation in vitro has been used to explore this question. It has been shown previously that for low doses of low-LET radiation delivered at high dose rates, there is a suppression of neoplastic transformation frequency at doses less than around 100 mGy. In the present study, dose-response curves up to a total dose of 1000 mGy have been generated for photons from (125)I decay (approximately 30 keV) delivered at doses rates of 0.19, 0.47, 0.91 and 1.9 mGy/min. The results indicate that at dose rates of 1.9 and 0.91 mGy/min the slope of the induction curve is about 1.5 times less than that measured at high dose rate in previous studies with a similar quality of radiation (28 kVp mammographic energy X rays). In the dose region of 0 to 100 mGy, the data were equally well fitted by a threshold or linear no-threshold model. At dose rates of 0.19 and 0.47 mGy/min there was no induction of transformation even at doses up to 1000 mGy, and there was evidence for a possible suppressive effect. These results show that for this in vitro end point the DDREF is very dependent on dose rate and at very low doses and dose rates approaches infinity. The relative risks for the in vitro data compare well with those from epidemiological studies of breast cancer induction by low- and high-dose-rate radiation.
Similar articles
-
Low doses of very low-dose-rate low-LET radiation suppress radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro and induce an adaptive response.Radiat Res. 2008 Mar;169(3):311-8. doi: 10.1667/RR1199.1. Radiat Res. 2008. PMID: 18302492
-
Health risks of low photon energy imaging.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006;122(1-4):528-33. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncl449. Epub 2007 Jan 29. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2006. PMID: 17261539 Review.
-
Application of Bayesian inference to characterize risks associated with low doses of low-LET radiation.Bull Math Biol. 2001 Sep;63(5):865-83. doi: 10.1006/bulm.2001.0243. Bull Math Biol. 2001. PMID: 11565407
-
Neoplastic transformation in vitro induced by low doses of 232 MeV protons.Int J Radiat Biol. 2005 Apr;81(4):291-7. doi: 10.1080/09553000500140324. Int J Radiat Biol. 2005. PMID: 16019938
-
Review of relative biological effectiveness dependence on linear energy transfer for low-LET radiations.J Radiol Prot. 2009 Mar;29(1):5-21. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/29/1/R01. Epub 2009 Feb 18. J Radiol Prot. 2009. PMID: 19225189 Review.
Cited by
-
The role of dose rate in radiation cancer risk: evaluating the effect of dose rate at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels using key events in critical pathways following exposure to low LET radiation.Int J Radiat Biol. 2016 Aug;92(8):405-26. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1186301. Epub 2016 Jun 7. Int J Radiat Biol. 2016. PMID: 27266588 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The effect of lycopene supplementation on radiation-induced micronuclei in mice reticulocytes in vivo.Radiat Environ Biophys. 2019 Aug;58(3):425-432. doi: 10.1007/s00411-019-00795-0. Epub 2019 May 23. Radiat Environ Biophys. 2019. PMID: 31123854 Free PMC article.
-
Human Lung Cancer Risks from Radon - Part III - Evidence of Influence of Combined Bystander and Adaptive Response Effects on Radon Case-Control Studies - A Microdose Analysis.Dose Response. 2012;10(3):415-61. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.09-059.Leonard. Epub 2010 Sep 10. Dose Response. 2012. PMID: 22942874 Free PMC article.
-
"Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector model"--HeLa x skin exposure to Cs not protective bystander response but mammogram and diagnostic X-rays are.Dose Response. 2008;6(3):272-82. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.07-031.Leonard. Epub 2008 Mar 20. Dose Response. 2008. PMID: 18846260 Free PMC article.
-
Unstable chromosome aberrations do not accumulate in normal human fibroblast after fractionated x-irradiation.PLoS One. 2015 Feb 27;10(2):e0116645. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116645. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25723489 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources