Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Dec 6:1:29.
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-1-29.

Measures for assessing practice change in medical practitioners

Sharon Hakkennes  1 , Sally Green
Affiliations

Measures for assessing practice change in medical practitioners

Sharon Hakkennes et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: There are increasing numbers of randomised trials and systematic reviews examining the efficacy of interventions designed to bring about a change in clinical practice. The findings of this research are being used to guide strategies to increase the uptake of evidence into clinical practice. Knowledge of the outcomes measured by these trials is vital not only for the interpretation and application of the work done to date, but also to inform future research in this expanding area of endeavour and to assist in collation of results in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Methods: The objective of this review was to identify methods used to measure change in the clinical practices of health professionals following an intervention aimed at increasing the uptake of evidence into practice. All published trials included in a recent, comprehensive Health Technology Assessment of interventions to implement clinical practice guidelines and change clinical practice (n = 228) formed the sample for this study. Using a standardised data extraction form, one reviewer (SH), extracted the relevant information from the methods and/or results sections of the trials.

Results: Measures of a change of health practitioner behaviour were the most common, with 88.8% of trials using these as outcome measures. Measures that assessed change at a patient level, either actual measures of change or surrogate measures of change, were used in 28.8% and 36.7% of studies (respectively). Health practitioners' knowledge and attitudes were assessed in 22.8% of the studies and changes at an organisational level were assessed in 17.6%.

Conclusion: Most trials of interventions aimed at changing clinical practice measured the effect of the intervention at the level of the practitioner, i.e. did the practitioner change what they do, or has their knowledge of and/or attitude toward that practice changed? Less than one-third of the trials measured, whether or not any change in practice, resulted in a change in the ultimate end-point of patient health status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Types of outcome measures used.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Outcome measure data collection methods.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cook DJ, Greengold NL, Ellrodt AG, Weingarten SR. The relation between systematic reviews and practice guidelines. Ann of Intern Med. 1997;127:210–216. - PubMed
    1. Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L, Whitty P, Eccles MP, Matowe L, Shirran L, Wensing M, Dijkstra R, Donaldson C, Hutchinson A. Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8 - PubMed
    1. Mowatt G, Grimshaw JM, Davis DA, Mazmanian PE. Getting evidence into practice: the work of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Group (EPOC) J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2001;21:55–60. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340210109. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O'Brien MA, Freemantle N, Oxman AD, Wolf F, Davis DA, Herrin J. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003. - PubMed
    1. Anonymous OMERACT, Conference on Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials. Proceedings. Maastricht, The Netherlands, April 29-May 3, 1992. J Rheumatol. 1993;20:527–591. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources