Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Dec;74(6):1143-52.
doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1152.

How stress management improves quality of life after treatment for breast cancer

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

How stress management improves quality of life after treatment for breast cancer

Michael H Antoni et al. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Dec.

Abstract

The range of effects of psychosocial interventions on quality of life among women with breast cancer remains uncertain. Furthermore, it is unclear which components of multimodal interventions account for such effects. To address these issues, the authors tested a 10-week group cognitive-behavioral stress management intervention among 199 women newly treated for nonmetastatic breast cancer, following them for 1 year after recruitment. The intervention reduced reports of social disruption and increased emotional well-being, positive states of mind, benefit finding, positive lifestyle change, and positive affect for up to 12 months (indeed, some effects strengthened over time). With respect to mechanisms tested, the intervention increased confidence in being able to relax at will. There was also evidence that effects of the intervention on the various outcomes examined were mediated by change in confidence about being able to relax. Thus, this intervention had beneficial effects on diverse aspects of quality of life after treatment for breast cancer, which appear linked to a specific stress management skill taught in the intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental design and flow diagram of participation. T = Time.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structural model of latent growth curves using outcome variables at three assessments (at 6-month intervals) to define two latent variables (intercept and slope) and using experimental condition (intervention vs. control) to predict those latent variables. MI is the differential effect of the intervention on the intercept of the growth curves. MS is the differential effect of the intervention on change over time. An asterisk indicates that in some models tested, this loading was estimated rather than specified as 12. T = Time.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mediational model, in which experimental condition predicts the slope of an outcome variable across three time points (MS-Outcome), experimental condition predicts the slope of the Measure of Current Status (MOCS) Relaxation scale across three time points (MS-Mocs), and the slope of the MOCS predicts the slope of the dependent variable. Mediation is suggested if MS-Outcome no longer is significant in this model and if setting the MS-Outcome path to zero does not significantly change model fit. MI is the differential effect of the intervention on the intercept of the respective growth curves. MS is the differential effect of the intervention on change over time. An asterisk indicates that in some models tested, this loading was estimated rather than specified as 12. T = Time; MI-Outcome = mediational path of intervention effect on outcome intercept; MI-MOCS = mediational path of intervention effect on MOCS intercept.

References

    1. Adler NE, Horowitz M, Garcia A, Moyer A. Additional validation of a scale to assess positive states of mind. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1998;60:26–32. - PubMed
    1. Alferi S, Carver CS, Antoni MH, Weiss S, Duran R. An exploratory study of social support, distress, and disruption among low income Hispanic women under treatment for early stage breast cancer. Health Psychology. 2001;20:33–41. - PubMed
    1. Altman D, Schulz K, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, et al. The Revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration. Annuals of Internal Medicine. 2001;134:663–694. - PubMed
    1. Andersen BL. Psychological interventions for cancer patients to enhance the quality of life. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1992;60:552–568. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen BL, Farrar W, Golden-Kreutz D, Glaser R, Emery C, Crespin T, et al. Psychological, behavioral and immune changes after a psychological intervention: A clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2004;22:3570–3580. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types