Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006;10(6):R170.
doi: 10.1186/cc5120.

Informed consent for research obtained during the intensive care unit stay

Catherine Chenaud  1 , Paolo Merlani, Samuel Luyasu, Bara Ricou
Affiliations

Informed consent for research obtained during the intensive care unit stay

Catherine Chenaud et al. Crit Care. 2006.

Abstract

Introduction: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) may be in an inadequate condition to give their informed consent for research. The aim of this study was to analyse the ability to recall participation in a clinical trial for which ICU patients had given their consent.

Methods: The data presented are a two-step observational study: first, a protocolled informed consent procedure was conducted then the informed consent was given by the patient, and second, a patient interview was held 10 +/- 2 days later by the same investigator. The primary endpoints were the ability to recall their participation in the clinical trial, as well as its purpose and related risks. As secondary endpoints, we investigated whether asking questions about the clinical trial or reading the informative leaflet was related to the recall. To be included in the study, the patient had to have a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15, be fully oriented and free of mechanical ventilation, and be judged competent by both the investigator and the attending physician. Patients admitted to the ICU after major surgery or trauma were eligible. However, patients who refused to participate, or those whose next-of-kin gave consent, were excluded.

Results: Of the 44 patients, 35 (80%) recognized, 10 to 12 days after informed consent had been obtained, that they had participated in the clinical trial, but only 14 out of 44 (32%) could recall the clinical trial purpose and its related risks. More patients with complete recall had read the informative leaflet or asked at least one question before signing the informed consent. Asking at least one question was associated with complete recall.

Conclusion: Our results confirm that obtaining informed consent for research during an ICU stay is associated with poor patient recall of participation in a clinical trial and its components (purpose and risk). Whether encouraging reading the informative leaflet and asking questions about the clinical trial improves the informed consent procedure remains to be fully investigated.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of the patients.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Word Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research involving Human Subjects 5th revision Edinburgh. 2000. - PubMed
    1. OJ. L 121/34. 2000. Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of the 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on the medicinal products for human use. 4 April 2001. - PubMed
    1. Luce JM. Is the concept of informed consent applicable to clinical research involving critically ill patients? Crit Care Med. 2003;31(3 Suppl):s153–60. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000054901.80339.01. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research . The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects in Research. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1979. - PubMed
    1. Etchells E, Sharpe G, Burgess MM, Singer PA. Bioethics for clinicians: 2. Disclosure. CMAJ. 1996;155:387–391. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types