Aiming to increase birth weight: a randomised trial of pre-pregnancy information, advice and counselling in inner-urban Melbourne
- PMID: 17156466
- PMCID: PMC1712341
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-299
Aiming to increase birth weight: a randomised trial of pre-pregnancy information, advice and counselling in inner-urban Melbourne
Abstract
Background: In the 1980s there was substantial interest in early pregnancy and pre-pregnancy interventions to increase birth weight and reduce preterm birth. We developed an inter-pregnancy intervention, implemented in a randomised controlled trial, to be provided by midwives at home soon after women's first birth.
Methods: MCH nurses invited women to take part during their home visit to new mothers. Women's contact details, with their permission, were passed to the study midwife. She had a randomisation schedule to which women's names were added before she met the women or their partners. All women recruited had a home visit from the study midwife with a discussion of their first pregnancy, labour and birth and the postpartum experience. Women in the intervention arm received in addition a pre-pregnancy intervention with discussion of social, health or lifestyle problems, preparation and timing for pregnancy, family history, rubella immunisation, referrals for health problems, and a reminder card. The primary outcome was defined as a birth weight difference in the second birth of 100 g (one-sided) in favour of the intervention. Additional data collected were gestational age, perinatal deaths and birth defects. Analyses used EPI-INFO and STATA.
Results: Intervention and comparison groups were comparable on socioeconomic factors, prior reproductive history and first birth outcomes. Infant birth weight in the second birth was lower (-97.4 g,)) among infants in the intervention arm. There were no significant differences between intervention and comparison arms in the proportion of women having a preterm birth, an infant with low birthweight, or an infant with a birth weight <10th percentile. There were more adverse outcomes in the intervention arm: ten births <32 weeks), compared with one in standard care, and more infants with a birth weight <2000 g, 16 compared with two in standard care
Conclusion: As the primary outcome was envisaged to be either improved birth weight or no effect, the study was not designed to identify the alternative outcome with confidence. Despite widespread support for pre-pregnancy interventions to improve maternal and perinatal health, this first randomised controlled trial of a multi-component intervention provided at home, did not have a beneficial outcome.
References
-
- Wynn M, Wynn A. Prevention of handicap and the health of women. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1979. pp. 43–63.
-
- Lumley J, Astbury J. Advice for pregnancy. In: Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse M, editor. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth. Oxford, Oxford University Press; 1982. pp. 236–254.
-
- Kohner N, Health Education Council . Pregnancy book. A guide to becoming pregnant, being pregnant and caring for your newborn baby. London: Health Education Council; 1984.
-
- Preventing low birthweight. Washington, DC, National Academy Press; 1985. US Academy of Sciences, Committee to Study the Prevention of Low Birth Weight, Division of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Institute of Medicine; pp. 1–3. 15–18.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
