Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Dec;7(12):908-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2006.04.010.

The orofacial formalin test in the mouse: a behavioral model for studying physiology and modulation of trigeminal nociception

Affiliations
Free article

The orofacial formalin test in the mouse: a behavioral model for studying physiology and modulation of trigeminal nociception

Philippe Luccarini et al. J Pain. 2006 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

The aim of the current study was to adapt the orofacial formalin pain model previously developed in rats for use in mice and to characterize as fully as possible the behavioral changes in this species. The effects of subcutaneous injection of different formalin concentrations (.5%, 1%, 2%, 4%, and 8%) were examined on the face-rubbing response. In mice, formalin injection into the upper lip induced sustained face-rubbing episodes with vigorous face-wash strokes directed to the perinasal area. A positive linear relationship between formalin concentration and amplitude of the rubbing activity was observed during the first and second phase of the test with concentration up to 4%. With the highest concentration used (8%), the amplitude of both phases had plateaued. Systemic administration of morphine and paracetamol induced a dose-dependent inhibition of the rubbing behavior during the second phase. Although both paracetamol and morphine inhibited the first phase, a dose-dependent inhibition was found only for morphine. The ED50 value (95% confidence interval) for suppressing the rubbing response during the first phase was 2.45 mg/kg (1.90-3.08 mg/kg) for morphine. The ED50 values for suppressing the rubbing response during the second phase were 3.52 mg/kg (2.85-4.63 mg/kg) for morphine and 100.66 mg/kg (77.98-139.05 mg/kg) for paracetamol. Heterosegmental nociceptive stimulation evoked by subcutaneous injection of capsaicin into the back of the animal 10 min before the formalin test produced a dose-dependent inhibition of the second phase of the rubbing response. The ED50 values for suppressing the rubbing response during the first and second phases were 9.04 microg (1.36-65.13 microg) and 0.92 microg (0.28-2.99 microg), respectively. In conclusion, the mouse orofacial formalin test appears to be a reliable model for studying the behavioral encoding of the intensity of nociceptive orofacial stimulation and the counter-irritation phenomenon and for testing analgesic drugs.

Perspective: To further exploit the new opportunities of investigating nociceptive processing at the molecular level with the transgenic "knockout" approach, we require suitable behavioral models in mice. The presented mouse orofacial formalin test appears to be a reliable model for studying the behavioral encoding of the intensity of nociceptive stimulation and the counter-irritation phenomenon and for testing analgesic drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources