Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Oct;61(5):445-50.

Recurrence of postoperative aortic fistulas: is there an ideal method of prevention? A case report

Affiliations
  • PMID: 17159753
Review

Recurrence of postoperative aortic fistulas: is there an ideal method of prevention? A case report

M Picichè et al. Minerva Chir. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

There are very few cases in English literature of recurrent postoperative aortic fistulas (RPAFs). These are neo-communications between the aortic bloodstream and the lumen of contiguous organs which occur after unpredictable periods from surgical treatment of a previous fistula. The supradiaphragmatic aorta may fistulize into the airways, pulmonary circulation, oesophagus, and cardiac chambers; the infradiaphragmatic aorta into the intestine, stomach, and vena cava. According to the etiology, aortic fistulas are categorized as postoperative (or secondary) and spontaneous (or primary), and RPAF may be considered a subgroup of secondary fistulas. They may recur even more times in the same patient, hence the role of prevention is of the utmost importance. The simultaneous respect of different surgical principles is crucial to make the risk of recurrence less likely. Surgical treatment represents a real challenge due to the emergency conditions and redo nature of operations. Mortality rate is very high. In this article, we describe a case of recurrent aorto-duodenal communication, we discuss the principles of prevention both for the supra and infradiaphragmatic aorta, we introduce some modifications to the classic categorization and we present the first RPAF literature review.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms