Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robotic-assisted gastric bypasses
- PMID: 17161087
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.038
Robotic assistance provides excellent outcomes during the learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: results from 100 robotic-assisted gastric bypasses
Abstract
Background: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has a reported learning curve of 100 cases. Robotic-assisted surgery decreases the learning curve in complex laparoscopic surgeries. We hypothesize that robotic-assisted, hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy during a LRYGB will improve results during the initial 100 cases when compared with the literature.
Methods: Our first 100 robotic-assisted gastrojejunostomies performed during LRYGB were reviewed from a prospective database. Patient demographics, operative times, length of stay, reoperations, anastomotic leak, pulmonary embolus, and death were all evaluated.
Results: The mean age and body mass index were 42 and 50, respectively. Operative times ranged from 148 minutes to 437 minutes (mean = 254). There were no leaks or deaths. Four patients had complications, including reoperation (1), incisional hernia (1), pulmonary embolus (1), and recurrent umbilical hernia (1).
Conclusions: Robotic-assisted LRYGB is feasible and safe, as evidenced by the excellent outcomes from this series during the initial learning curve for LRYGB.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005 Nov-Dec;1(6):549-54. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2005.08.008. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005. PMID: 16925289 Clinical Trial.
-
Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Arch Surg. 2005 Aug;140(8):779-86. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.8.779. Arch Surg. 2005. PMID: 16103289
-
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 5-year results of a prospective randomized trial.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Mar-Apr;3(2):127-32; discussion 132-3. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Feb 27. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007. PMID: 17331805 Clinical Trial.
-
Management of complications after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Minerva Chir. 2009 Jun;64(3):265-76. Minerva Chir. 2009. PMID: 19536052 Review.
-
Gastric bypass: why Roux-en-Y? A review of experimental data.Arch Surg. 2007 Oct;142(10):1000-3; discussion 1004. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.10.1000. Arch Surg. 2007. PMID: 17938315 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the learning curve for robotic single-anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy.Front Surg. 2022 Jul 22;9:969418. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.969418. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 35937606 Free PMC article.
-
Technique evolution, learning curve, and outcomes of 200 robot-assisted gastric bypass procedures: a 5-year experience.Obes Surg. 2015 Jun;25(6):997-1002. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1502-9. Obes Surg. 2015. PMID: 25394589
-
Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass performed in a community hospital setting: the future of bariatric surgery?Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3312-21. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1714-1. Epub 2011 May 26. Surg Endosc. 2011. PMID: 21614667
-
Current status of robotic bariatric surgery: a systematic review.BMC Surg. 2013 Nov 7;13:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-53. BMC Surg. 2013. PMID: 24199869 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of hospital charges between robotic, laparoscopic stapled, and laparoscopic handsewn Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.J Robot Surg. 2009 Jun;3(2):75-8. doi: 10.1007/s11701-009-0143-9. Epub 2009 May 29. J Robot Surg. 2009. PMID: 27638218
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials