A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography
- PMID: 17161522
- DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.048
A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography
Abstract
Objective: To assess the value of noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) as a possible predictor of renal stone disintegration by shock wave lithotripsy (SWL).
Patients and methods: The study included 120 consecutive patients (71 males, 49 females; mean age: 42.6 yr) with a solitary renal stone of 0.5-2.5 cm in length. NCCT was performed using a multidetector row CT scanner at 120 KV and 240 mA, with 1.25-mm collimation. A bone window was used to measure stone attenuation values. SWL was performed with an electromagnetic lithotripter. Failure of disintegration was defined as no fragmentation of the stone after three sessions. The impact of patients' sex, age, and body mass index (BMI) and the stones' laterality, location, volume, mean attenuation value, and the skin-to-stone distance on disintegration were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses.
Results: Failure of disintegration was observed in 15 patients (12.5%). BMI and stone density >1000 HU were the significant independent predictors of failure (p=0.04 and 0.02, respectively). The success rate of extracorporeal SWL at 3 mo was 87.5% (105 of 120 patients); 90 patients were stone free and 15 had residual fragments<4 mm. The only significant predictor of residual fragments was stone density (p<0.001).
Conclusions: Obesity and increased stone density as detected by NCCT are significant predictors of failure to fragment renal stones by SWL. An alternative treatment should be devised for obese patients with stone density>1000 HU.
Similar articles
-
A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1227-1232. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0364. Epub 2016 Oct 3. J Endourol. 2016. PMID: 27597174
-
A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients' selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study.BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E438-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x. Epub 2012 Feb 28. BJU Int. 2012. PMID: 22372937
-
Comparing non contrast computerized tomography criteria versus dual X-ray absorptiometry as predictors of radio-opaque upper urinary tract stone fragmentation after electromagnetic shockwave lithotripsy.Urolithiasis. 2013 Nov;41(6):511-5. doi: 10.1007/s00240-013-0596-1. Epub 2013 Aug 3. Urolithiasis. 2013. PMID: 23907170
-
Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review.Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Apr;24(4):173-185. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01145-w. Epub 2023 Feb 21. Curr Urol Rep. 2023. PMID: 36802317 Free PMC article.
-
Noncontrast Computed Tomography Parameters for Predicting Shock Wave Lithotripsy Outcome in Upper Urinary Tract Stone Cases.Biomed Res Int. 2018 Dec 2;2018:9253952. doi: 10.1155/2018/9253952. eCollection 2018. Biomed Res Int. 2018. PMID: 30627582 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Role of Stone Heterogeneity Index in Determining Success of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Urinary Calculi.J Clin Transl Res. 2021 Mar 24;7(2):241-247. eCollection 2021 Apr 22. J Clin Transl Res. 2021. PMID: 34104827 Free PMC article.
-
Do anxiety, stress, or depression have any impact on pain perception during shock wave lithotripsy?Can Urol Assoc J. 2016 May-Jun;10(5-6):E171-E174. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3445. Epub 2016 May 12. Can Urol Assoc J. 2016. PMID: 27790298 Free PMC article.
-
Reinforcement of the Triple D score with simple addition of the intrarenal location for the prediction of the stone-free rate after shockwave lithotripsy for renal stones 10-20 mm in diameter.Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Feb;51(2):239-245. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-02066-1. Epub 2019 Jan 2. Int Urol Nephrol. 2019. PMID: 30604235
-
Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Ureteral Stones: Evaluation of Patient and Stone Related Predictive Factors.Int Braz J Urol. 2015 Jul-Aug;41(4):676-82. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0330. Int Braz J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26401859 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of success following extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in a contemporary cohort.Urol Ann. 2021 Jul-Sep;13(3):282-287. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_155_19. Epub 2021 Jul 14. Urol Ann. 2021. PMID: 34421266 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical