Net clinical benefit: functional endpoints in brain tumor clinical trials
- PMID: 17164049
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02951427
Net clinical benefit: functional endpoints in brain tumor clinical trials
Abstract
Primary brain tumors are associated with a poor prognosis and recognized impact on physical and neurologic function. In an effort to improve poor prognosis, novel therapeutic approaches have been pursued. The impact of therapy on function has not been fully evaluated in the past, with clinical trials focused on traditional survival endpoints. Therapies to date have been associated with incremental improvements in survival that may not have been associated with improvement in functional status. Methods for evaluating this impact include health-related quality of life symptom burden and evaluation of neurocognitive function. Each approach has associated benefits and limitations based on the type of treatment and the potential impact on functional status. An essential component of trial design evaluating functional endpoints is the development of clear hypotheses, specific aims, and predefined metrics of functional change related to each measure. This paper reviews these three approaches and discusses their potential use in evaluation of therapies for patients with primary brain tumors.
Similar articles
-
Refining endpoints in brain tumor clinical trials.J Neurooncol. 2012 Jun;108(2):227-30. doi: 10.1007/s11060-012-0813-8. Epub 2012 Mar 27. J Neurooncol. 2012. PMID: 22451194
-
Endpoints for clinical trials and revised assessment in neuro-oncology.Curr Opin Neurol. 2012 Dec;25(6):780-5. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328359b45e. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012. PMID: 23007010 Review.
-
Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. Epub 2003 Jul 17. Stroke. 2003. PMID: 12869717
-
Brain-tumour clinical-trial endpoints: FDA public workshop.Lancet Oncol. 2006 Mar;7(3):205-6. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(06)70609-x. Lancet Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16538792 No abstract available.
-
Clinical trial design for local therapies for brain metastases: a guideline by the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Brain Metastases working group.Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):e33-e42. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30692-7. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29304360 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical trial end points for high-grade glioma: the evolving landscape.Neuro Oncol. 2011 Mar;13(3):353-61. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noq203. Epub 2011 Feb 9. Neuro Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21310734 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Risk factors, predictive models, and general work ability trajectory in patients with glioma.Neurooncol Adv. 2025 May 7;7(1):vdaf094. doi: 10.1093/noajnl/vdaf094. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec. Neurooncol Adv. 2025. PMID: 40575407 Free PMC article.
-
The Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale: a tool to assess neurologic function for integration into the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria.Neuro Oncol. 2017 May 1;19(5):625-635. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox029. Neuro Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28453751 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Opportunities and challenges of incorporating clinical outcome assessments in brain tumor clinical trials.Neurooncol Pract. 2019 Mar;6(2):81-92. doi: 10.1093/nop/npy032. Epub 2018 Aug 7. Neurooncol Pract. 2019. PMID: 31386029 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development of a core outcome set and identification of patient-reportable outcomes for primary brain tumour trials: protocol for the COBra study.BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 30;12(9):e057712. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057712. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36180121 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Miscellaneous