This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

. 2006;17(1):83-119.

Conscience in context: pharmacist rights and the eroding moral marketplace

Robert K Vischer¹

Affiliations

PMID: 17165232

Conscience in context: pharmacist rights and the eroding moral marketplace

Robert K Vischer. Stanford Law Pol Rev. 2006.

. 2006;17(1):83-119.

Author

Robert K Vischer¹

Affiliation

¹ University of St. Thomas School of Law, Minnesota, USA.

PMID: 17165232

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Pharmacists' rights at front of new debate; because of beliefs, some refuse to fill birth control prescriptions.
Stein R. Stein R. Washington Post. 2005 Mar 28:A1, A10. Washington Post. 2005. PMID: 15838957 No abstract available.
Pharmacies balk on after-sex pill and widen fight; right of refusal cited; many states take up the issue; citing religious and moral concerns.
Davey M, Belluck P. Davey M, et al. N Y Times Web. 2005 Apr 19:A1, A16. N Y Times Web. 2005. PMID: 15858909 No abstract available.
Moralists at the pharmacy.
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] N Y Times Web. 2005 Apr 3:WK12. N Y Times Web. 2005. PMID: 15838987 No abstract available.
An essential prescription: why pharmacist-inclusive conscience clauses are necessary.
Knestout BP. Knestout BP. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2006 Spring;22(2):349-82. J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2006. PMID: 17117701 Review. No abstract available.
Emergency contraception, institutional conscience, and pharmacy practice.
Card RF, Williams KG. Card RF, et al. J Pharm Pract. 2014 Apr;27(2):174-7. doi: 10.1177/0897190013515710. Epub 2013 Dec 18. J Pharm Pract. 2014. PMID: 24352808 Review.

See all similar articles

Cited by

The uneasy (and changing) relationship of health care and religion in our legal system.
Vischer RK. Vischer RK. Theor Med Bioeth. 2013 Apr;34(2):161-70. doi: 10.1007/s11017-013-9248-2. Theor Med Bioeth. 2013. PMID: 23546737
Harm or Mere Inconvenience? Denying Women Emergency Contraception.
McLeod C. McLeod C. Hypatia. 2010 Winter;25(1):11-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01082.x. Hypatia. 2010. PMID: 20706565 Free PMC article.
Religion, conscience, and controversial clinical practices.
Curlin FA, Lawrence RE, Chin MH, Lantos JD. Curlin FA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 8;356(6):593-600. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa065316. N Engl J Med. 2007. PMID: 17287479 Free PMC article.
The conscience debate: resources for rapprochement from the problem's perceived source.
Hardt JJ. Hardt JJ. Theor Med Bioeth. 2008;29(3):151-60. doi: 10.1007/s11017-008-9073-1. Theor Med Bioeth. 2008. PMID: 18752040

MeSH terms

Substances

Actions