Prevention of antigenically drifted influenza by inactivated and live attenuated vaccines
- PMID: 17167134
- PMCID: PMC2614682
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa061850
Prevention of antigenically drifted influenza by inactivated and live attenuated vaccines
Abstract
Background: The efficacy of influenza vaccines may decline during years when the circulating viruses have antigenically drifted from those included in the vaccine.
Methods: We carried out a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of inactivated and live attenuated influenza vaccines in healthy adults during the 2004-2005 influenza season and estimated both absolute and relative efficacies.
Results: A total of 1247 persons were vaccinated between October and December 2004. Influenza activity in Michigan began in January 2005 with the circulation of an antigenically drifted type A (H3N2) virus, the A/California/07/2004-like strain, and of type B viruses from two lineages. The absolute efficacy of the inactivated vaccine against both types of virus was 77% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37 to 92) as measured by isolating the virus in cell culture, 75% (95% CI, 42 to 90) as measured by either isolating the virus in cell culture or identifying it through real-time polymerase chain reaction, and 67% (95% CI, 16 to 87) as measured by either isolating the virus or observing a rise in the serum antibody titer. The absolute efficacies of the live attenuated vaccine were 57% (95% CI, -3 to 82), 48% (95% CI, -7 to 74), and 30% (95% CI, -57 to 67), respectively. The difference in efficacy between the two vaccines appeared to be related mainly to reduced protection of the live attenuated vaccine against type B viruses.
Conclusions: In the 2004-2005 season, in which most circulating viruses were dissimilar to those included in the vaccine, the inactivated vaccine was efficacious in preventing laboratory-confirmed symptomatic illnesses from influenza in healthy adults. The live attenuated vaccine also prevented influenza illnesses but was less efficacious. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00133523.)
2006 Massachusetts Medical Society
Figures
Comment in
-
Different approaches to influenza vaccination.N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 14;355(24):2586-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe068257. N Engl J Med. 2006. PMID: 17167142 No abstract available.
-
Influenza vaccines.N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 15;356(11):1172; author reply 1173. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc070026. N Engl J Med. 2007. PMID: 17360998 No abstract available.
-
Inactivated influenza vaccine prevented influenza in healthy adults.ACP J Club. 2007 May-Jun;146(3):60. ACP J Club. 2007. PMID: 17474669 No abstract available.
References
-
- Davenport FM. Control of influenza. Med J Aust. 1973 Suppl:33–38. - PubMed
-
- Bridges CB, Thompson WW, Meltzer MI, et al. Effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination of healthy working adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000;284:1655–1663. - PubMed
-
- Edwards KM, Dupont WD, Westrich MK, Plummer WD, Jr, Palmer PS, Wright PF. Randomized controlled trial of cold-adapted and inactivated vaccines for the prevention of influenza A disease. J Infect Dis. 1994;169:68–76. - PubMed
-
- Belshe RB, Mendelman PM, Treanor J, et al. Efficacy of live attenuated, cold-adapted, trivalent, intranasal influenza vaccine in children. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1405–1412. - PubMed
-
- Belshe RB, Gruber WC, Mendelman PM, et al. Efficacy of vaccination with live attenuated, cold-adapted, trivalent, intra-nasal influenza virus vaccine against a variant (A/Sydney) not contained in the vaccine. J Pediatr. 2000;136:168–175. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical