Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Dec;12(6):373-7.
doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.011403.

Evidence into practice: combining the art and science of injury prevention

Affiliations

Evidence into practice: combining the art and science of injury prevention

M Brussoni et al. Inj Prev. 2006 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To bring together scientific evidence of what works in injury prevention with the knowledge and experience of practitioners, using a case study of smoke alarm installation from England.

Design: There is good evidence of strategies to reduce injuries but less is known about the art of translating those strategies to implementation in real-world settings. England's Health Development Agency developed a structured process applicable to many public health fields, which integrates practitioner knowledge into the evidence base and reflects local contexts. The multistep process includes convening structured field meetings with local practitioners and policy makers, which focus on a mapping exercise of strategies, policies, targets, and funding streams related to childhood injury prevention, and barriers and facilitators relating to implementation of specific interventions.

Setting: Meetings were held in six venues across England with 98 participants from a range of professional backgrounds and sectors.

Results: The collective knowledge of participants provided many local insights unlikely to emerge in conventional research. Discussion topics covered key partners and sectors to include when planning a program; national policies and programs that could be used to drive the agenda; potential sources of funding; the importance of providing and installing appropriate smoke alarms; targeting of programs; and suggestions for gaining access to hard-to-reach populations.

Conclusion: This methodology represents an efficient way of gaining insight necessary for successful implementation of evidence based programs. It may be particularly useful in lower and middle income countries, serving to translate evidence into the local contexts and circumstances within which practitioners operate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: none.

Comment in

References

    1. Mallonee S, Istre G R, Rosenberg M.et al Surveillance and prevention of residential‐fire injuries. N Engl J Med 199633527–31. - PubMed
    1. DiGuiseppi C, Roberts I, Wade A.et al Incidence of fires and related injuries after giving out free smoke alarms: Cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2002325995–999. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roberts H, Curtis K, Liabo K.et al Putting public health evidence into practice: Increasing the prevalence of working smoke alarms in disadvantaged inner city housing. J Epidemiol Community Health 200458280–285. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arai L, Popay J, Roberts H.et alPreventing accidents in children—how can we improve our understanding of what really works? Exploring methodological and practical issues in the systematic review of factors affecting the implementation of child injury prevention initiatives. Final Report. London: Health Development Agency, 2003
    1. Arai L, Roen K, Roberts H.et al It might work in Oklahoma but will it work in Oakhampton? Context and implementation in the effectiveness literature on domestic smoke detectors. Inj Prev 200511148–151. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types