Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jun;179(4):563-70.
doi: 10.1007/s00221-006-0817-8. Epub 2006 Dec 15.

The influence of stimulus direction and eccentricity on pro- and anti-saccades in humans

Affiliations

The influence of stimulus direction and eccentricity on pro- and anti-saccades in humans

Joan M Dafoe et al. Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jun.

Abstract

We examined the sensory and motor influences of stimulus eccentricity and direction on saccadic reaction times (SRTs), direction-of-movement errors, and saccade amplitude for stimulus-driven (prosaccade) and volitional (antisaccade) oculomotor responses in humans. Stimuli were presented at five eccentricities, ranging from 0.5 degrees to 8 degrees , and in eight radial directions around a central fixation point. At 0.5 degrees eccentricity, participants showed delayed SRT and increased direction-of-movement errors consistent with misidentification of the target and fixation points. For the remaining eccentricities, horizontal saccades had shorter mean SRT than vertical saccades. Stimuli in the upper visual field trigger overt shifts in gaze more easily and faster than in the lower visual field: prosaccades to the upper hemifield had shorter SRT than to the lower hemifield, and more anti-saccade direction-of-movement errors were made into the upper hemifield. With the exception of the 0.5 degrees stimuli, SRT was independent of eccentricity. Saccade amplitude was dependent on target eccentricity for prosaccades, but not for antisaccades within the range we tested. Performance matched behavioral measures described previously for monkeys performing the same tasks, confirming that the monkey is a good model for the human oculomotor function. We conclude that an upper hemifield bias lead to a decrease in SRT and an increase in direction errors.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Vision Res. 1998 Oct;38(19):2979-85 - PubMed
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1995;103(1):168-73 - PubMed
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1992;89(1):214-22 - PubMed
    1. J Opt Soc Am. 1967 Aug;57(8):1024-9 - PubMed
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1985;58(3):455-72 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources