Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan;25(1):160-9.
doi: 10.1002/jmri.20813.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI study of male pelvic perfusion at 3T: preliminary clinical report

Affiliations

Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI study of male pelvic perfusion at 3T: preliminary clinical report

Ping Hou et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To detect male pelvic perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) vs. controls by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) at 3T.

Materials and methods: Eighteen male patients were studied with T1-weighted (T1W) DCE-MRI to measure perfusion, phase-contrast (PC) imaging to measure bulk flow, and contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRA to detect stenosis. Regions of interest (ROIs) in prostate, corpus cavernosal, and spongiosal tissues were analyzed. Two-compartment pharmacokinetic modeling was employed to fit the signal enhancement. Perfusion parameters were analyzed by curve-fitting and utilized to compare the CAD and control groups. Validated questionnaires measuring urinary and erectile function were used to evaluate pelvic symptomatology in both groups.

Results: Mean perfusion analysis confirmed weaker and slower enhancement in CAD patients vs. controls despite equivalent cardiac output values. The mean maximum enhancement was 26.33 +/- 0.12 (controls) vs. 22.38 +/- 0.44 (CAD) for prostate. The mean wash-in rate in units of minute(-1) was 62.10 +/- 1.74 (controls) vs. 34.44 +/- 1.08 (CAD) for prostate, 16.68 +/- 0.72 (controls) vs. 8.04 +/- 0.36 (CAD) for spongiosal, and 8.34 +/- 0.54 (controls) vs. 3.48 +/- 0.24 (CAD) for cavernosal tissues (all with P < 0.0001).

Conclusion: This preliminary study demonstrates that perfusion parameters differ between CAD and control patients, and the findings mirror the differences in pelvic symptoms in these groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources