Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan;103(1):102-8.
doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.06.008. Epub 2006 Sep 1.

Evaluation of cross-section airway configuration of obstructive sleep apnea

Affiliations

Evaluation of cross-section airway configuration of obstructive sleep apnea

Takumi Ogawa et al. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Upper airway imaging techniques can be useful to identify the exact location and nature of the obstruction in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients. Ten OSA patients and 10 non-OSA control subjects were imaged using cone-beam computed tomography (NewTom QR-DVT9000) to compare their upper airway structure. The OSA subjects presented higher BMI (OSA: 29.5 +/- 9.05 kg/m(2); non-OSA: 23.1 +/- 3.05 kg/m(2) [P = .034]), lower total volume (mm(3)) of the airway (OSA: 4868.4 +/- 1863.9; non-OSA: 6051.7 +/- 1756.4 [P = .054]), statistically significantly smaller anterior-posterior dimension (mm) of the minimum cross-section segment (OSA: 4.6 +/- 1.2; non-OSA: 7.8 +/- 3.31 [P = .009]), and smaller minimum cross-section area (OSA: 45.8+/-17.5 mm(2); non-OSA: 146.9 +/- 111.7 mm(2) [P = .011]) positioned below the occlusal plane in 70% of the cases (OSA:7 out of 10; non-OSA: 5 out of 10 [P = .030]). The OSA group presented a concave or elliptic shaped airway and the non-OSA group presented a concave, round, or square shaped airway.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The region of interest selected by the operator as the oropharyngeal region defined in two planes: the mid-sagittal image of the airway (a) and the axial image (b).
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The region of interest selected by the operator as the oropharyngeal region defined in two planes: the mid-sagittal image of the airway (a) and the axial image (b).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The volume computed of the oropharyngeal region for a control (a and b) and an OSA case (c and d).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The volume computed of the oropharyngeal region for a control (a and b) and an OSA case (c and d).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The volume computed of the oropharyngeal region for a control (a and b) and an OSA case (c and d).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The volume computed of the oropharyngeal region for a control (a and b) and an OSA case (c and d).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Axial NewTom image of the smallest cross-section area (a); the anteroposterior (7.8mm) and lateral dimensions (17.7mm) of the same area (b).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Axial NewTom image of the smallest cross-section area (a); the anteroposterior (7.8mm) and lateral dimensions (17.7mm) of the same area (b).

References

    1. Ferguson KA, Ono T, Lowe AA, Ryan CF, Fleetham JA. The relationship between obesity and craniofacial structure in obstructive sleep apnea. Chest. 1995;108:375–81. - PubMed
    1. Lowe AA, Fleetham JA, Adachi S, Ryan CF. Cephalometric and computed tomographic predictor of obstructive sleep apnea severity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107:589–95. - PubMed
    1. Lyberg T, Krogstad O, Djupesland G. Cephalometric analysis in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: Skeletal morphology. J Laryngol Otol. 1989;103:287–92. - PubMed
    1. Lyberg T, Krogstad O, Djupesland G. Cephalometric analysis in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: 2 Soft tissue morphology. J Laryngol Otol. 1989;103:293–7. - PubMed
    1. Li HY, Chen NH, Wang CR, Shu YH, Wang PC. Use of 3-dimensional computed tomography scan to evaluate upper airway patency for patients undergoing sleep-disordered breathing surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129:336–42. - PubMed