Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2007 Aug;78(8):790-9.
doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2006.095414. Epub 2006 Dec 18.

A review of screening tests for cognitive impairment

Affiliations
Review

A review of screening tests for cognitive impairment

Breda Cullen et al. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007 Aug.

Abstract

The merit of screening for dementia and cognitive impairment has been the subject of recent debate. One of the main limitations in this regard is the lack of robust evidence to support the many screening tests available. Although plentiful in number, few such instruments have been well validated in the populations for which they are intended to be used. In addition, it is likely that "one size does not fit all" in cognitive screening, leading to the development of many specialised tests for particular types of impairment. In this review, we sought to ascertain the number of screening tools currently available, and to examine the evidence for their validity in detecting different diagnoses in a variety of populations. A further consideration was whether each screen elicited indices of a range of cognitive, affective and functional domains or abilities, as such information is a valuable adjunct to simple cut-off scores. Thirty-nine screens were identified and discussed with reference to three purposes: brief assessment in the doctor's office; large scale community screening programmes; and identifying profiles of impairment across different cognitive, psychiatric and functional domains/abilities, to guide differential diagnosis and further assessment. A small number of screens rated highly for both validity and content. This review is intended to serve as an evaluative resource, to guide clinicians and researchers in choosing among the wide range of screens which are currently available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Hebert L E, Beckett L A, Scherr P A.et al Annual incidence of Alzheimer disease in the United States projected to the years 2000 through 2050. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 200115169–173. - PubMed
    1. Henon H, Durieu I, Guerouaou D.et al Poststroke dementia: incidence and relationship to prestroke cognitive decline. Neurology 2001571216–1222. - PubMed
    1. Pohjasvaara T, Erkinjuntti T, Ylikoski R.et al Clinical determinants of poststroke dementia. Stroke 19982975–81. - PubMed
    1. Iliffe S, Wilcock J, Austin T.et al Dementia diagnosis and management in primary care: Developing and testing educational models. Dementia 2002110–23.
    1. Barrett J J, Haley W E, Powers R E. Alzheimer's disease patients and their caregivers: medical care issues for the primary care physician. South Med J 1996891–9. - PubMed

Publication types